Wearing Of The Educational Mask

807 Words4 Pages
The psychological observations of Charles A. Prosser and a colleague named Charles Allen are demonstrated in Wearing of the Mask. They observed that as a learner gains experience in the formal learning atmosphere, the learner tends to take on an alternate personality . . . to wear a “mask” while he performs just enough to somewhat please the instructor. This proverbial mask is shed when the learner is authentically interested in something. Further, they state that many still believe that children are highly motivated by rewards. Prosser and Allen theorize that rewards “may serve somewhat when the task itself does not appeal and the mask is on. When the task itself appeals, medals are only artificial and superficial devices or worse, for the mask is off!” Prosser and Allen further state that this dual personality will persist as long as we continue to distinctualize between the artificial learning environment of the typical classroom and the natural processes of learning. I whole-heartedly agree with this theory. Actually, having been through the education system, I can say that I’ve lived the theory at times. Certainly, there were subjects that were genuinely interesting to me and with those subjects, the things I learned in those classes are still with me. Conversely, those subjects or classes in which I wore the “mask”, I did what I had to do to make a good grade, then shed the information because I didn’t see the significance that the information had in my life at that time. I find this theory particularly interesting because Prosser & Allen were not the first to observe that artificial learning in the classroom wasn’t the best way to learn. As early as 1483, Francois Rabelais was advocating the use of games, recreation and manual labor and “that learning should take place through natural events and situations”. In the late 1500s, Richard
Open Document