Violence and Nonviolence

795 Words4 Pages
"Let him hit you but don't hit him back". This quote is from a non-violence member telling the non-violence league not to have violent behaviors. It was Gandhi's method of working out his league. He meant to do it, and have no self-defense against the British to make them be frustrated, and solve the conflicts between the Indians and British in a peaceful way. Since, he made his non-violence league, Gandhi has been and he is a role model and/or heroic person to the Indian's. Meanwhile, we are surrounded by violence. From children’s cartoons and games to the news from Iraq, we are witnesses to its power and harm. Violence is a problem that we as humans, deal with everyday. Today, it seems that we deal with it in just about every aspect of our lives. Many people think that no matter the causes of violence or for that fact aggressors, we have a personal responsibility must be taken for violent actions. Both of them are victims in some other aspects, because people pursue good lives, but violence is one of the few instances that destroy that good life. It is defined as an act taken against another being with the intent to do harm. We often consider violence in terms of the aggressor, yet violence can be in a variety of ways even including self-defense. Violence and nonviolence are some argument Therefore, there is some questions that arise out of the argument of violence and nonviolence: “Is violence ever acceptable or nonviolence?” First of all, Comparing Violence and Nonviolence, nonviolence is less bloody. At first, no matter the situation, people never are violent in my opinion. I think of issues such as wars or if someone is trying to kill you or your family. How could someone not do anything? It also cause the killing never ended. Human beings are imitative creatures. We do what we see. How is the younger generation of people going to be nonviolent
Open Document