All states and the federal government have laws establishing victims’ rights. As a matter of fact, victims’ rights should not be placed on the back burner because there is a language barrier. Criminal justice administrators are always looking for creative and cost effective ways to deal with language barriers that derive from serving a multicultural population. Victims’ rights usually apply to victims of felonies which are the more serious crimes. However, some states also grant rights to victims of misdemeanors.
DWI Lawyers Case Handling, Investigation and Appeals If a person is charged under DWI offense than the only person who can provide you assistance is DWI Lawyer. Mostly people do not take DWI offenses serious and thought that these are simple as normal cases, but people do not know that this type of offenses have serious consequences and deep impact on offender’s future. Every state in US has its own DWI attorney and DWI lawyers of each state deals cases according to their state’s laws. This is because every state made DWI laws according to their previous case histories and punishment of same offense may differ in every US state. The duty of DWI Lawyer is to protect your rights and after examining the consequences ensure you a fair trial.
It’s not easy to protect that information with all the new technology that is being produced and some protection software and security holes which hacks seem to find them quite often now days. Software Company’s try to patch them as soon possible but sometimes they are too late and hacks have already found it and stolen a lot of information. One of my former health care company (Anthem Blue Cross) was hack a few months ago and when they looked into it they found another breach so they sent every member two year of Protectmyid.com so if my information get used I am protected. I am not too mad about it because they did not know about the security hole and I am glad they are helping protect everyone information but I hate that someone somewhere may have my
I don’t think the people should be able to get off that easy simply because of a legal mishap and in fact disgusts me that his has happens numerous times every year. If we could change this I believe it would have an extremely positive impact on our society and make it even more difficult for criminals to get off unpunished. References Tankebe, J. (2009). Policing, procedural fairness and public behavior: a review and critique.
After reading those sections several times, I am still sort of lost, but I also somewhat understand. However sections 3, 5, and6 were not as clear as water, but clear enough to understand. Ancient Egypt is not called our first great civilization for no reason. Due to the hard work they endured, it all paid off in the end. These passages relate to our new generations in so many
Recent events in the United States have led to a number of calls for the abolition of conditional releases from prison. In support of their position, many parole abolitionists cite opinion polls that appear to show that the public is very dissatisfied with the parole system, not to mention with the judicial system as a whole. It doesn’t take a genius, nor does it take extensive research for one to realize that parole is our biggest alternative to incarceration. The purpose of this study was to find viable alternatives to incarceration. 1.
Undermines: To weaken or ware away Contention 01: Plea Bargaining gives us the right to speedy trial One of our constitutional rights as Americans to a speedy trial. While this right can be waived by a defendant, it must be provided to him unless he explicitly declines it. The Criminal Justice System would collapse; we would see people being forced to wait months, even years. To have their cases heard, thus violating their constitutional rights. As such, given the current level of judicial resources, plea bargains are absolutely necessary and indeed beneficial in the quest to uphold all constitutional rights.
The case of Laporte involves kettling which is determined as the containment of crowds of demenstrators within a limited area. It is a controversial police tactic and its lawfulness has been the subject of several appellate court decisions. The starting point for an analysis of kettling is Art 5 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). This provides a right not to be deprived of liberty in certain situations and is an absolute right. On the face of it, the containment of demonstrators would appear to be a clear breach of Art 5, however the courts have now focused on the exceptional circumstances in which the state will have lawful justification to employ the tactic.
I think that ‘vengeance vs. reform’ is such an important topic where it can affect the family of the victim and the criminal could have different opinions towards the type of punishment the judge will choose to apply in the case. Victim side will most likely want lots of vengeance or no mercy on the criminal while the criminals side will always think that the punishment they received was too much or that it was unfair. I think that is fundamental for the court and the judge to think for a perfect punishment that will be the most equal and fair for both the victim and the criminal , but not forgetting the type of crime that was
U.S.A. Patriot Act The founding fathers believed in civil liberties and paid the price for freedom. Freedom isn’t earned, it’s fought relentlessly and passed down for a new generation to be able to know what it’s like to be free. Is freedom a right or a privilege? Very few people can pay for it let alone handle it, it’s something that cannot be on a fine line or in between, you either have it or you don’t. I believe we take advantage of it because we are used to it and no one has been able to take it away from us, most of the people in the U.S. probably don’t know their full rights, the rights people before them died for in order to keep the future secure.