Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere Assess Different Marxist Views of the Relationship Between Crime and Social Class

1513 Words7 Pages
Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess different Marxist views of the relationship between crime and social class. Traditional Marxism sees capitalist society as divided into two classes: the ruling capitalist class (or bourgeoisie) who own the means of production, and the working class (or proletariat), who’s alienated labour the bourgeoisie exploit to produce profit. Marxism is a structural theory. It sees society as a structure in which the economic base (the capitalist economy) determines the shape of the superstructure, which is made up of all the other social institutions, including the state, the law and the criminal justice system. Their function is to serve ruling-class interests and maintain the capitalist economy. For traditional Marxists, the structure of capitalist society explains crime. Their view of crime has three main elements: firstly criminogenic capitalism, secondly the state and law making, and thirdly ideological functions of crime and law. Through the Marxist perspective, as Item A configures, crime is not the fault of the individual but is linked to their social position and the unequal distribution of wealth in society. A particular Marxist view of the relationship between crime and social class is known as criminogenic capitalism. For Marxists, crime is inevitable in capitalism because capitalism is criminogenic. Capitalism is based on the exploitation of the working class – that is, on using them as a means to and end (profit), whatever the human cost of doing so. It is therefore particularly damaging to the working class and this may give rise to crime. Firstly Marxists believe that poverty may mean that crime is the only way the working class can survive therefore this results in the form of a relationship between crime and social class. Moreover crime may be the only way they can obtain the consumer goods encouraged by
Open Document