Security vs. Privacy We know that people want security in their in life but prefer their privacy, so when it comes down to it which is more important? We read how Bruce Schneier wanted the people to have privacy and how he knows that people don’t do anything but with constant surveillance the government will accuse you of something. As on the other hand we have Chris Cillizza who believes that privacy is important but it won’t keep you safe from foreign attacks. Also Cillizza shows that any type of information that the government finds suspicious will put people at risk. Honestly in this type of argument it comes down to the better facts rather than opinions and that’s why Cillizza makes the better argument.
What if the attacker saw us, and became enraged at us that we saw something we should not have? I wanted to do something to help the girl being hurt, and I knew that was the right thing to do. We could have just ran home and never thought about that day again. But we did not. We did not exactly interfere, but instead stayed a safe distance away and called the police.
The purpose also is if law enforcement was to take the evidence it would not be used in the court of law unless issue or that person can be set free of all charges. Basically one wrong moved can make us lose a suspect of a horrible crime if we are not careful. Law enforcement just need to be cautious so they are doing their jobs correct, and setting a person free will get them into trouble (cjlf.org, 2011). When we are identifying the exclusionary rule it is a great rule to have so police have to stop and think. Police have to think before they search because it could cost them a lot if they just do what they want.
The fact that officers know that illegally obtained (but true) evidence will quite possibly be thrown out, and therefore dangerous criminals will be freed, will encourage them to follow the proper procedures. (Woodfin, 2009) In addition, there are already several exceptions to requiring a warrant, such as “stop-and-frisk”, airport and school searches, voluntary searches, and emergency situations (Scheb, 2008) While these arguments supported the continued use of the exclusionary rule, there are also many argue against its value to our criminal justice system. One of the most
Also, technology and managerial efforts’ failures are conceivable and it can be crucial in certain circumstances. Similarly, judges’ plan for placing yard signs is somewhat raise negative signal in the criminals, who wants to overcome his guilt. As a result, he would isolate himself from the society, and which in turn will produce negative outcomes. Then again, for the public safety, it is necessary to ratify different security mechanism despite the presence of moral and legitimate issues. So, it would be healthy to trace and map criminal’s residence to avoid potential threats of
There should be more harsh punishments for domestic abuse, the charges are too lenient. No one, especially husband or wife, should be able to abuse someone just because they think they can. REFERENCES Jacoby, Barbara. (June, 2011). Let Life Happen: Domestic Abuse and Substance Abuse.
As I would like to think, if people are not considered responsible for law violations against mankind, our general public will never again be viewed as socialized. I do accept however, the equity framework need to be actualizing more suitable disciplines, for unlawful acts without a casualty. I think a few cases ought to be considered for more probation for peaceful law violations, and a workable arrangement of projects, rather than detainment. I think, if the wrongdoing is about cash or medications that don't bring about the demise of another, these individuals can be pivoted from displaying criminal acts. I accept assault cases ought to request great treatment for the criminal.
Others argue that these incidents can be traced back to poor training and policies. Still other selected persons maintain that the whole system needs to be changed and that with the rise in crime, officers have become enforcers more than protectors. A policy is defined as a definite course of action to determine decisions or a guide to decision making within a structured framework. A procedure however is often considered to be simply a consistent method of operation. In cases of police brutality officers may see strict policy, which is the product of thoughtful analysis, as just procedure, which may not be detrimental to the officer if broken (Kinnaird203).
Should the officer be fired or demoted or should said officer just be reprimanded with no repercussions? Both choices could solve the problem and both could be morally correct but there are other factors to take into consideration. Firing or demoting the officer could induce moral problems within the department and just reprimanding the officer could appear to be a sign of weakness. It takes a strong moral character and conviction to make such decisions and balance the consequences of those decisions. Individual versus community is another situation that criminal justice administrators must face.
After feeling threatened Daniel pulls out his weapon which may have been concealed within his vehicle and shoots Malik. At this point Daniel becomes a defendant because even though he was defending himself he still discharged a weapon in a public event which is against the law, because only public officials who are licensed to carry and use a firearm in public events may do so. When Daniel slips into a diabetic coma as a result of the beverage he had drink earlier becomes the plaintiff against the concession worker who accidently had given him sugary beverages instead of diet becomes a defendant because of his/her negligence. Plaintiff: Malik, Daniel Defendants: Daniel because of his shove against Malik causing Malik to fall hit his