If sharks were to be extinct then we would not be able to go with our families to the beach to have a fun in the waters as the water would be disgusting and not swimmable. While the numbers of large sharks have been going low it has led to the collapse of fisheries being able to go out to sea to fish as sharks play an important role of keeping the fish and coral reefs healthy. As large sharks do have an important role in the ocean, we do have to be cautious about where we swim as we could be in there territory or near predators. If you do take a shark out of there eco-system then in conclusion there will be bad consequences, because they keep their eco-system healthy and clean. For example imagine you at home doing your own thing then out of nowhere an intruder comes in and kidnaps you and while that happens there will be consequences but in the end you will end up being shot, not a good thing to think about so we should think the same about sharks.
For instance, when you go fishing you put on sunscreen to avoid getting sunburn, and if you hear thunder or see lightening you immediately turn the boat to the docks and get out of the water to avoid being struck by lightning. While positive and negative reinforcement increases the likelihood of a behavior, punishment and extinction decrease the likelihood of the behavior. For example, as parents we punish our children for biting or hitting other children. If a child were to bite or hit another child, punishing by a time out or a way you see fit, the child would decrease the likelihood of the “bad” behavior from occurring again because it produced a negative consequence for the child that did the biting or hitting. Extinction in operant conditioning is used to weaken a behavior by not experiencing the positive condition or stopping a negative one (Kowalski & Westen, 2011).
The people behind us clapped. The old man waved them off and sat back down in the skiff to fan his face again”. The way Sonny explains what is happening seems like he has no clue what was going on and why they are doing the things they do. Another thing that happened in the chapter was Sonny and Keo went to catch a shark to show the director what a real one looks like. The boys set a trap for the shark and waited until the next day to find the buoy twenty feet underwater.
In the future, they must learn to proactively address critical needs. As the damages of Katrina unfolded, vital issues such as preservation of water supply and food safety were overlooked. This resulted in pollution of the water and even greater health and sanitation issues. Shelters were over-crowded and volunteers even became an issue. All of these flaws in their practices serve as input to their lessons learned and how to better plan for these types of natural disasters.
Another reason why the sea is wearing a mask of innocence is because it lures people in with its beauty and scenery. When the person gets close enough, it sucks them in and kills them. The sea doesn’t do it itself, but with the help of the capaill uisce. Also, the ocean is hypnotizing all animals and people to come to it, just to feed the capaill uisce. That is how the ocean is wearing a mask of innocence and is hypnotizing to people.
The scene the turns back to the boyfriend who can not hear her screams, because he has passed out. This also shows how isolated Chrissy is. The scene then finishes with Chrissy being pulled under the water, leaving a mess behind. This scene plays heavily on the fact that Chrissy is isolated from the rest of her group and so can’t be helped when she is being attacked by the shark. This is important, as it is present all the way through the
Is it right for cruise ships to dump waste into the sea, which will cause environmental damage to marine life, affect the people and land on island nations, just so the cruise ships can gain more revenue by not having to build storage for their waste that will inconvenience their customers? The primary stake holders in this case that are beneficial to the dumping of non-human waste are: shareholders, executives, staff and passengers. The primary stake holders in this case that are harmed by the dumping on non-human waste are: Island Nations, Fisherman and Marine life. The primary stakeholders in this case that’s legal rights are exercised from the dumping of non-human wastes are: The Cruise Ship Companies. The primary stakeholders in this case that’s legal rights are being denied from the dumping of the non-human wastes are: The Island Nations.
He makes it clear to the audience that the development of the reef into a marina will be the loss of 'something precious' and will lead to the 'franchise, chlorination and sterilisation' of the wildlife. He appeals by giving examples of the 'wilderness experience' that is the reef. By using the rhetorical question 'how many places can you go to where you can swim with a whale shark, be circled by manta rays and see a dugong' he is showing the audience the uniqueness of the location, giving more reason for the protection and the prevention of the development. He also takes an attacking argument on the 'five star resorts' of the world, saying that when people return from a holiday, they do not remember the 'shopping mall like' hotels, 'seen one, seen them all' type buildings, unlike nature which is unique and diverse in each location. Why replace uniqueness with
Appropriate Strategy: I suggest the Dad change this situation by changing the physical environment around the child and by preventing predictable problems. The dad can move around the furniture to block the outlets and also prevent this predictable problem by child proofing the home they live in. 5. Appropriate Strategy: In addition to stating a safety rule, I would change the situation by introducing new ideas and material to the child. I would first remind John that throwing sand in the air can get into everyone’s eyes and that its not safe.
One way is to have a role of global media coverage that will handle the information about the contaminated water in the area towns. The one effect of the globalization of communication is that reports from the media about the crisis situation can make the government react to the outcome of the media coverage. The way in which the media has to put information out to the public has become an issue of importance itself (Ale, Kersten, Voort, Vos, & Zoeteman, 2010). My team and I can deny any of the false information that the media is putting out, and provide accurate information, which would help keep the public from panicking. These technologies can be used to improve the communication with my team and increase the public trust that the situation is getting