True Love or Just Pueril Passion?

1723 Words7 Pages
Constanza Cariola True Love, or just Puerile Passion? Whenever I think about Romeo and Juliet, I remember the balcony scene, above all others. Is that idealized love which remains in my head after finishing the play with the tragic death of the two “star-cross’d lovers”. And it is so strong, that when I describe the play to others, I say “it is a love story” or either “it is a romantic tragedy”. This makes me wonder if it is like that; if Romeo and Juliet it is a love story. That is the main issue of this essay. Harold Bloom wrote in his Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human that the love between Romeo and Juliet was “as healthy and normative a passion as Western literature affords us” (100). Being aware of Shakespeare’s knowledge of human being, I can not accept that he wrote the play, thinking that the love that the couple shared was healthy. To be a healthy love must be a true love. The nature of this love I am going to explain to prove that Romeo’s and Juliet’s love was not such. Then I will exemplify it with quotes from the play, based in two facts: first, the lovers did not know each other; and secondly, they were too young and passionate to understand the true meaning of love. They just did not have the maturity. But let us begin with the nature of love. Plato is the founder of our philosophy of love, which he illustrated in his Symposium. In it he describes through many characters the characteristics of love. Among them, says that young love is fragile and inconstant: “It would be desirable to have a law banning those too young to love, to do not have to spend time on something so uncertain. Because, who knows which will be the result some day of such tender youth? Which turn will the body and spirit take, and to where they will go to? Whether to vice or to virtue?” To Plato, mature love “is highly moderate, because the Temperance consists in

More about True Love or Just Pueril Passion?

Open Document