Sometimes even normal-seeming registered gun owners appear to go mad and kill, as tragically happened at Hungerford and Dunblaine in the U.K. Quite simply, guns are lethal and the fewer people have them the better. Law-abiding citizens deserve the right to protect their families in their own homes, especially if the police are judged incapable of dealing with the threat of attack. Would-be rapists and armed burglars will think twice before attempting to break into any house where the owners may keep firearms for self-defense. (This can also be applied to the right to carry concealed weapons, deterring potential rapists, muggers, etc), [Gun
This is to let people know that the punishment always far outweighs thecrime. For example, one method is to embarrass a young person because they committed acrime, or to tell them that eventual embarrassment is part of the punishment before theyeven commit the crime. I think that general deterrence is the most effective way to handle young people andcrime. This tells the young person know, well before they commit a crime, that they will be caught and punished, which prevents them from committing the crime at all. The other methods handle individual problems.
Spanking and Aggression in Young Children Can spanking really lead to aggressive behavior in young children? In my opinion, it can and usually does. Have you ever gotten a spanking from a parent or adult, but then were told “hitting and slapping are not okay,” by that same adult? You probably felt confused or angry and asked them, “why is it ok for you to slap me, but it’s not okay for me to slap you?” This is one of a few reasons why I do not believe spanking is an effective form of punishment and can lead to aggressive behavior in children. It can cause confusion, which can then lead to stress, which can then result in aggressive behavior from the child.
Argument: For Jeff Jacoby, writer of “A Desensitized Society Drenched in Sleaze,” violent entertainment indirectly causes real life violence. He states that even with his highly religious and disciplined background he was “jaded” from exposure to violent TV. he thinks that if he can be desensitized, then anyone can be desensitized. With that thought, Jacoby may have a valid point. If exposed to violent TV for an extended amount of time, it may be able to desensitize anyone, especially if they come from an already broken home or bad neighborhood.
Accordingly, the way in which he carried himself is reflected from his own interpretation of outer world experiences. The inner nature of his existence is the main cause for the rapturous feelings of greatness which were projected from the inner depths of his despair. For only the defendant has allowed himself to feel a triumphant joy which helped him to recreate meaning into his otherwise troubled life with an act of murder. Since most of his life has revolved around acts of violence and neglect he inwardly embodied these notions than projected these strange feelings outwards towards other people because he did not understand why they happened. The purpose in doing this was to make him believe that he could deprive himself of all sorrows by forcing others to feel the way he has felt in the past.
Regular humans have a hard time comprehending the physiological, sociological, and anthropological mindset of these killers. As culture humans have overlooked serial killers, grouping them with social rejects and the mentally insane. This is perhaps why they try to attract as much attention as possible. In order to stop serial killers, we have to understand what makes them kill, why do they enjoy the kill, and why don’t they feel an emotional attachment to their victims. By decreasing bullying, child abuse, parental ignorance, and self-hatred, we have a better chance at not only saving the lives of innocents, but of those who kill as
That's why all suicides are morally questionable, because next to your family, and social-circle, the paramedics, the police, the coroner, they all lose something, in having to clean you up. To what extent is a police officer morally obligated to assess whether a person he or she shoots actually wants to be killed? I believe there isn’t an extent because if a person tries to point a weapon at you there intention is to kill not just to injury unless they want to commit suicide in this
He also offers discounts to students that want to buy guns from him. I believe that he sees this as a protection for the students. The thing that is very strange about this, as mentioned before, is that he has sold guns to two mass killers and he does not see their appearances at the schools and killings as terrible incidents or being disrespectful. His point of view is quite scary actually. The author, Bob Herbert, completely disagrees with Thompson.
Jhalan Jackson English Gun Control Guns can be used to harm people, or can protect the life of millions who have encountered a near death experience to a gun. Most people might be for gun control, which can have its positive, but can also have its negatives. People need to realize this is a world a cruel world we live in and the use of guns can also save the lives of many. So, why not protect yourself with justified actions? There are too many guns in the streets to take control of them all, therefore forget about trying to take control of the gun, and take control of a life or death situation.
It is not the guns fault for people wanting to kill people. People that do these things are psychopaths. They had a reason that they thought was good enough to kill people. Not all the people that were killed by guns deserved to be killed but the gun was being controlled by someone, the gun did not do it by