To What Extent Was Gustav Stresemann Responsible for the Increased Stability in Germany in the Years 1923-29?

964 Words4 Pages
After becoming Chancellor in 1923, Stresemann was hugely influential in the period 1923-29. Before his appointment as Chancellor (which lasted six months), the Weimar Republic had serious problems such as hyperinflation, the low quality of life, several uprisings such as The Spartacist Uprising and the Kapp Putsch and the fact that the country at the time could not afford to pay reparations. As a result of this, France and Belgium had decided to invade and occupy the Ruhr, Germany’s most industrial region. This impacted the German economy massively, adding to the huge list of problems Gustav Stresemann was to sort out between 1923 and 1929. However, it was Hans Luther and Hjalmer Schact who dealt with the hyperinflation crisis of 1923 and not Gustav Stresemann. Germany had to deal with a problem where the German people were leaving baskets on the ground filled with money, only to find people were taking the baskets rather than the currency, since it had depreciated so much over 1923. This was because, in order to deal with the crisis initially, the German government had begun to print money, which essentially devalued the currency because it started to become worth less. This cycle grew rapidly and eventually the Mark became worthless, with commodities such as eggs costing 10,000,000 marks. However, in order to solve this problem once and for all, Hans Luther took decisive action and replaced the mark with the rentenmark, a new currency. Since this currency was not produced on the scale of its predecessor - supply was restricted to 3.2 billion rentenmarks - the value held much better and therefore the inflation rate was significantly curbed. As a result, economic stability was achieved for the first time in 18 months in Germany, for which Luther and Schact, not Stresemann was hugely responsible. Without a solution to the hyperinflation crisis, Germany could have
Open Document