To What Extent Is the Comedy in Much Ado About Nothing at the Expense of the Female Characters?

1678 Words7 Pages
To what extent is the comedy in Much Ado About Nothing at the expense of the female characters? Shakespeare’s ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ combines “Villainy and scheming with humour and sparkling wordplay” to subtly fashion a satirising gender critique of the conventional female in the Elizabethan patriarchal society. David Lucking precisely argues that the play revolves “around a drama of groundless jealousy” while Ross Stewart describes Much Ado as a “problem play of obscure intent”, much like ‘The Tempest’. I believe ‘Much Ado’ creates humour by using the dominant role of male characters to gently ridicule the expected position of female characters in society; most notably through the portrayal of Hero and Beatrice; the latter having striking similarities to Katherine from ‘The Taming Of The Shrew’ due to her repugnance towards marriage. Humour at the expense of women is also prominent in ‘Much Ado’ through the use of ‘vulgar’ pre-marriage language, favoured by Margret – another arguably unconventional woman of the Elizabethan society, who participates in sex outside of wedlock purely for pleasure, creating controversy and humour. “Seventy-five percent of Shakespearian plays have oaths they can’t keep” correctly states Paul McDonald. This regular form feature of Shakespearian comedies generates humour at the expense of women in ‘Much Ado’; in the form of Beatrice ironically being ‘manoeuvred into wedlock despite proclaimed repugnance for matrimony’: Beatrice: “Adam’s sons are my brethren, and truly, I hold it a sin to match in my kinred”. Beatrice breaks her oath of “remaining a wild, unconventional woman who denounces marriage” by instead becoming a product of proper Elizabethan social convention - Beatrice: “It were as possible for me to say I loved nothing so well as you”. This submission to the patriarchal society is also a common form feature of
Open Document