The truth existed long before humans; it exists whether we believe in it or not. Lies only exist if we create them, and they only survive if we believe in them. Lies are just a distortion of the word, a distortion of the meaning of a message, and that distortion is in the human mind. Humans are always distorting the truth with words, but that's not the problem. The problem is when we believe that distortion, because some lies are innocent, and others are deadly.
These flaws are usually associated with the fact that they are unable to fulfil the need to gain the answer since they may be biased, however even when these two ways of knowing are put together, they may contradict each other, or do not share the same view on the same exact case, this is what is considered as the conflict. In order to understand and find the answer to the question, the question must be clearly defined, in terms of emotion and reason as well as the idea of the conflict. Emotion is defined as any strong agitation of the feelings actuated by experiencing love, hate, fear, etc., and usually accompanied by certain physiological changes, as increased heartbeat or respiration, and often overt manifestation, as crying or shaking. Simply, emotion is the representation of one's mind when it comes to decision making or confronted with any other serious situation, and it occurs whether the individual consciously or subconsciously aware of it. Such example would be when one feels angered by the fact that the two choices given are not the choices that one desires or when confronted with an insulting joke, one would laugh at the joke, but disgusted or angered by the insult.
We can keep our assumptions to ourselves but unless we consider all aspects of the situation we are not thinking critically. It is also important to recognize when you have made an assumption and attempt to rid yourself of the assumption, keeping it there will only make matters more difficult. • Fallacies are a mistaken belief, especially one based on an unsound argument. Fallacies in written arguments generally come from some type of news source: Biased material that tries people to believe something though it may just be for their gain. Fallacies in oral arguments are similar to written arguments.
In simpler language, it means to aim for perfection. On the surface, it sounds nice, but all this ignores the basic human trait, the one shared across cultures, languages, and races: imperfection. To be human is to be errant. Thus, the dreams of idealists often get dashed and projects they attempt often end either in failure or at least "less than they could have been." On the other hand, realism means "the inclination towards literal truth and pragmatism" (ibid).
The lack of clarification for the term “proofs” does a disservice to McCloskey’s opening. The very things he considers “proofs” to the theist are in most studious circles actually considered “arguments” for the case of theism not “proofs”. It may appear the he is attempting to run it altogether to misdirect the reader into believing something that is not. McCloskey refers to the arguments as proofs and he often implies that they can’t definitively establish the case for God, but the Cumulative Case using the Cosmological Argument, the creator, the Teleological Argument, the intelligent designer and the Moral Argument, that He is a personal, morally perfect being is the best explanation that God exists which is the best explanation for the universe we experience. The claims of science aren’t a hundred percent indisputable or even a hundred percent factual and yet they are still accepted as valid, rationally convincing or highly probable, thus the belief in theism doesn’t have to be irrefutable to be accepted as the same.
Pseudo conflicts: Psuedo conflicts are generally not real conflict. People take on the image that they are conflicts because of making assumptions about a problem or situation. Many times it is false conflicts that cause this. 2. Fact conflicts: Fact conflicts are based on things that are known to be true or can be verified.
Here, individuals enter a constant state in which they try to convince themselves of what they believe to be truth and become ignorant. The idea that there is no such thing as true knowledge poses the first problem in the impossible quest for knowledge. Everything humans know and understand about the world was created by them. Frye states that everything we know is a product of our imagination. So, everything we know—all of our knowledge—is a product of our imagination.
Russell claims, lying is morally wrong, Carson believes in some cases it is preferable and Mazur states that different traditions advocate the lying in different circumstances. In brief, until and unless there is a question to save the life of an innocent person lying is morally wrong because, it diminishes trust, withholds the information that one might need, weakens our relationships, and above all it obliterates our honesty. Lying is a threat to the trust of liar. Trust is like a sticker one it got dispatched then it can never be pasted again perfectly. Similarly ones if the lying is mixed with trust then a threat against trust of any relation are produced.
Willpower vs. procrastination How to manage to do those things you’re finding difficult. Adman David Thomason reckons one of the most surprising things he has found in his voyage through human behavioural science is how counterintuitive some of it is. Often, what we think is going on in our brains is the opposite of our real problem. Take the No 1 problem in this area: procrastination. “The root cause of it turns out to not be laziness but impulsiveness,” Thomason exclaims.
Politics, Religion and Media are true forms of deception. Deception is differed from individual to individual, for some people deception has different theories and different measures, like in a relationship when one partner is cheating on other for one person it might prove to be a deception but for other one this is just might not wrong. Well we face so many emotional deceptions during our lifetime, which has no material value and cannot be framed as artful deceptive in nature. Deception has different measure and different levels based on individual. The deception or forge or fraud stories which we know are meant to be known for us, the people who did it they want us to know about their artful intelligence worldwide.