The Sociological Imagination

448 Words2 Pages
The Sociological Imagination and Common-sense explanations The aim of this essay is to discuss the differences between the Sociological Imagination and common-sense explanations. Firstly I will consider what common-sense actually is, and what the sociological imagination is before going on to discuss their different approaches and explanations in relation to parenting. Common-sense as defined by the Oxford Dictionary is “a good sense and sound judgement in practical matters.”(Oxford English dictionary, p289. Common-sense is seen as the ability to make reasonable decisions, based upon previous personal experiences. Statements that draw on common-sense don’t consider other circumstances such as cultural, political and economic circumstances. It is based on familiarity and therefore there is no sold evidence to support common-sense statements. Common-sense is narrow-mindedness; it fails to question information that you’re being told to believe. The sociological Imagination as described by C. Wright Mills is “The capacity to range from the most impersonal and remote transformations to the most intimate features of the human self – and to see the relations between the two.” (Mills, 1959 p7). Unlike common-sense sociology needs to be tested. The Sociological Imagination enables you to see the individual and the relationships of ordinary everyday life in relation to the wider society which understand its biography and history. To use the Sociological Imagination is to question what you’re being told. As Ribbens McCarthy et al point out, “Gendered divisions in parenting roles remain considerable in British families.” (Cited in Sociology Marsh, Keating, Punch and Harden, 2009 p465). A common-sense explanation relating to parenting in the context of gendered parenting roles is that “women are more nurturing and should be the parent that stays at home to take care
Open Document