McCloskey attempts to make an argument for the non-existence of God and to give reasons why atheism is more comforting than theism. This paper is a response to that article which will address certain ideas raised by Mr. McCloskey. This author is a theist and will present arguments to show the reasoning for the existence and necessity of God. To begin with, McCloskey suggests in his article that the theist’s arguments are “proofs” which do not provide definitive evidence for the existence of God, so therefore, they should be discarded. This is not a justified argument due to the fact that theists do not try to definitely prove the existence of God.
Burke opposed the instability and the reasoning of the revolution, as well as it’s potential to increase in violence and decline into anarchy, as it later did. Burkes opposition to the French revolution can also be inextricably linked to he’s insight that tradition should be prioritised over reason as he wrote ‘you possessed in some parts the walls and in all the foundations of a noble and venerable castle. You might have repaired those walls; you might have built on those old foundations… but
Source 8 does not support this view, however the only evidence supporting it being that tensions between Nationalists and Unionists was high and that because of their differences Ireland was preparing for a Civil War, as suggested by source 7. Source 8 is also a relatively modern book and so, like source 7, could be argued to carry more weight. On the other hand source 9 is a speech made by Andrew Bonar Law, a key unionist of the time, and therefore could be considered biased and not as reliable as the other sources.
It is a defense of studying each historical period on its own terms, and not imposing one's own moral and social standards on figures and situations that existed with, perhaps, a different set of ethical and cultural concerns. Butterfield’s text described historians who project modern attitudes on to the past, pass moral judgments on historical figures, and regard history as significant only to the extent that it labored to create the modern world. Such judgments are viewed as problematic because they tempt historians not to understand the past on its own terms. Butterfield argues that historians should write aesthetically rather than polemically, exercising "imaginative sympathy" in appreciating the lost worlds of the dead rather than seeking, or expecting, the vindication of their own current positions (92). The "Whig interpretation," as Butterfield calls it, sees history as a struggle between a progression of good libertarian parties and evil reactionary forces, failing to do justice to history's true complexity.
This paper discussed the reasons why American Imperialism was adopted and rationalized. There was also the major events mentioned that led to and happened during this policy along with countries that became involved due to American Imperialism. Still to this day the American Anti-Imperialist League still does not support the policy. As far as I can tell, Americans have been known to become selfish, no matter how much we have we will never be happy until we control the free world. References Davidson, Gienapp, Heyrman, Lytle, & Stoff (2005).
It is clear that Dix was not accurately depicting Dr. Heinrich Stadelmann as he would appear in life. This raises the question whether Stadelmann would have approved of the finished artwork, and what it was Dix was trying to say. As with any artwork, it is impossible to know where Dix’s interpretation ends and the viewer’s subjective inventiveness begins. Therein lies the effectiveness of art as a combined experience that transcends the intent of the artist. Dix may lay the groundwork through his strategic use of artistic elements, but it is ultimately the observer that builds the
The clause reflects compromise over an ideological question of sovereignty. We founding fathers cannot solve this fundamental problem of how centralized power should be. Rather, it is a struggle that will ensure a constant pursuit of order and
Israel Aprieto Ms.Henry Period 2 English 11 2/9/12 Modernism: The American Dream Lost Modernism is defined as a movement with “bold new experimental styles and forms that swept the arts during the first third of the twentieth century” (Haffner 1128). As the period of Modernism commenced, writers wanted to move away from Realist and Romanticist literature. They wrote about loss of faith in the American Dream and sense of disillusionment. Margaret Walker, for example, depicts her poem “Let America Be America Again” with elements of Modernism like sense of disillusionment. Her poem shows individuals who hope for a good dream of a better future but not being fulfilled yet.
It also owed to foreign influences. The transcendentalists rejected the theory that all knowledge comes to the mind through the senses. Truth, rather, transcends the senses and can't be found just by observation. Associated traits included self-reliance, self-culture, and self-discipline. ﻌRalph Waldo Emerson- transcendentalist poet and philosopher; urged American writers to forget European traditions and write about American interests.
Infalsafiable it may be I do not find it persuasive due one singular point of contention. I cannot find tenable any argument that is contingent on the existence of God or any divine spirit. Berkeley’s answer to his own admission of the likelihood of the continued existence of ideas over time is contingent on the existence of God or some sort of Divine perceiver. Berkeley’s theory presents God that is at all times perceiving. If, for lack of better terminology, God were to “turn his head” all that is not being perceived would cease to exist.