Giddens argues that fundamentalism is a reaction to globalisation. He sees society as having moved to a “late modern” phase, in which globalisation has undermined traditional norms regarding the nuclear family, gender and sexuality. People are now faced with choice, uncertainty and risk and in this environment, fundamentalism flourishes as it promises certainty with its rigid, dogmatic beliefs. Giddens argues that globalisation increases fundamentalism by providing an alternative to the risk society of late modernity. Fundamentalists may reject some aspects of modernity, they embrace others in order to spread their beliefs, for example, through the Internet, email and electronic church, suggesting that fundamentalism does not represent a total rejection of globalisation and modernity.
Life would be a lot harder if these things had never been created, wouldn’t it? Also, by going to other countries, we can make new ties with new nations economically, politically, and socially as well as gather more history or maybe learn something about other nations and how they use their resources. Another positive aspect of war
Traditional anarchist and Tory corporatist cultures may find that Teleology’s precepts are very compatible with Abrahamic religious beliefs. For this reason, we find that religious adherents are much more common in Tory and Anarchist groups, for reasons of tradition rather than conscious philosophical thought. For the same reason, Fascists are also more prone to have religious foundations. In the same way, Oligarchs may find religious beliefs acceptable, yet only if it is a tradition in their group. The quality of individuality so important in western values, best expressed in classical liberals and even more so in radical liberals, can also be expressed in the religious traditions of Islam and Protestant Christianity.
During times of war, it is understandable that the Government will be more apt to protect its people. In the United States, terrorism has become a major concern. This has come to light more recently after the 9/11 attack in 2004. Americans have been told that terrorism is their biggest enemy. Though in the attempts to obtain security, the people of the United States are giving up their freedoms and others are having those same freedoms taken away from them.
For these political aggressors, war is not merely a metaphor or the equivalent of a sports analogy. It is far more profound and stems from the conflict of “world view,” usually described as a “Biblical World view” against everything else. It is explicitly understood by its proponents as a religious war and waged accordingly on multiple fronts, mostly in terms we have come to define as “cultural.” How the conflict plays out takes on political dimensions and sometimes physical conflict. This war is theocratic in nature, and seeks
There are more cases of religious hate crimes related to Islam in Europe than in America, which is surprising considering America was the one most affected by 9/11. So a solution to all this is just education. Education could be the key to eliminating any wrongdoing. Much easier said than done. Something we all can do and are capable just to start it off is to learn not just about your own religion and teachings, but others as well.
The strongest argument is that war is acceptable if it’s in self defence or in the defence of a weaker power incapable of defending its self against a stronger power; in liberating people from an oppressive dictatorship or government; finally where the conflict will save more people than it kills. These are the main principles from the just war theory. The just war theory is highly credited in politics as it has been created over many centuries by the greatest philosophers of the ages like Augustine, Thomas Aquinas and Grotius. For example in the first gulf war when Iraq invaded Kuwait and the United Nations intervened in force headed by the Americans. This war can be perceived as just in the just war theory as it uses two
While other educated officials felt that the fundamentals of Islam are timeless, but the interpretations had to be reevaluated in order to apply in daily life. Therefore, an examination of the Islamic Revolution in Iran advocates a great truth with a myriad of implications: Religion can be a very potent catalyst of mass political action, and is a key foundation to the Islamic empires. As Karl Marx famously stated, “Religion is the opiate of the masses.” Therefore, the need for reform was because of changing times, along with the mistakes and corruption of the former political forces. The 1979 Iranian Revolution consequently came to be one of the most important occurrences in modern history. The relation between outside influences effecting society and already established structures was at the heart of the reform.
However, the policies of USA and USSR were not the sole factor that caused the gain in traction of religious fundamentalism as there were other aspects that also contributed to the rise of religious fundamentalism such as the economic hardships faced by Middle Eastern countries like Iran, the growing force of anti-secularism, and the the threat to national identity and territory imposed to the Arabic states. Taking into account these other factors will aid in asserting the extent of Soviet and Western policies causing the rise of religious fundamentalism. ! Policies of the West played a major role in contributing to the gain in momentum of religious fundamentalism. USA supported Israel since the end of World War ll and poured into Israel US$4 billion annually.
Religion is still significant in society today because fundamentalism has become more predominant. That is religious groups taking the words of holy scripture literally, and wanting to take society back to the time the scriptures were written. That they are willing to kill people and themselves in fundamentalist attacks proves that religion has not lost its significance in society. Fundamentalism is relevant to today’s society as many attacks have been witnessed in recent years in a number of different countries including England (7/7) America (9/11) and Spain. Also it cannot be argued that religion is not so significant in society today as sects and cults are becoming more and more popular in society , each portraying religious ideas, the fact that membership of such religious organisations are increasing suggest that religion has not lost its significance.