The Relation Between Formalism and Structuralism

3755 Words16 Pages
ASSIGNMENT The relationship between Formalism and Structuralism. Subject: Literary Theory Course Code: 502 Submitted to: Md. Kamrul Hasan, Lecturer Department of English Language and Literature Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University Submitted by: Rafiul Islam Shazu Roll=7112238 Masters 1st Semester Department of English Language and Literature Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University,Trishal,Mymensingh. DATE: March 19,2013. The relationship between formalism and Structuralism. Both Formalism and Structuralism were literary movements that took place in the 19th and 20th centuries. Formalism was distinctive for its emphasis on the functional role of literary devices and its original conception of literary history and Structuralism built off that notion, but broke down the idea into smaller parts. Structuralism focused not on the use of language, but rather on the underlying system of language. Out of these movements, several key phrases and ideas were born. Literariness, intentional fallacy, sign , and mythologies were just a few of the axioms to be produced. Structuralism and Formalism redefined how one looks at literature through the words alone. Formalism refers to critical approaches that analyze, interpret, or evaluate the inherent features of a text. These features include not only grammar and syntax but also literary devices such as meter and tropes. The formalist approach reduces the importance of a text’s historical, biographical, and cultural context.Structural linguistics thus involves collecting a corpus of utterances and then attempting to classify all of the elements of the corpus at their different linguistic levels: the phonemes, morphemes, lexical categories, noun phrases, verb phrases, and sentence types. Formalism The term formalism describes an emphasis on form over content or meaning in the arts, literature, or philosophy. A practitioner

More about The Relation Between Formalism and Structuralism

Open Document