Of course, that Louis XIV and Marie-Antoinette understood that the people of France didn’t like them but they didn’t want to believe in it. That is one of the reasons why they both didn’t try to do anything. One small step could have changed the whole course of the French Revolution. If only, they would have gone and asked the people of France what they need and what they want them to do. The way that they could have done this is by giving fair taxes and giving people the freedom of opinion and speech.
The Reign of Terror: Justified or Not? The Reign of Terror, a year-long bloodbath of the French Revolution, was it justified or not? Was there actually a reason why the Reign of Terror was necessary? Well, in fact, there was a reason it was necessary for the revolution. Although the Reign of Terror did not protect the rights of man like the starters of the French Revolution wanted, it helped secure military victories for the French against external enemies, quelled the counterrevolution that was stirring in France due to nobility and clergy, and the speaking prowess of political leaders, such as Robespierre, helped convince the common peoples to join the Reign of Terror in extinguishing external and internal enemies of France.
I believe that innocent people with out a fair trial or without valid evidence. The murders thought they were protecting France by taking these drastic measures. These people were acting out of fear more than on evidence as shown in the following quote “The were feared to be counterrevolutionaries who would aid the invading Prussians IV.
Sometimes you just cant help it when a gun goes off. People kill people with guns on daily basics out of anger or revenge. I can say I had about two people in my family die because of a gun. It is one of the worst things knowing that someone had that much anger not to talk it out a problem they wanted them dead. It is really not something you want to play around with.
In result of this, this cause loads of deaths. To conclude the actions from the officers were a very important factor in causing a high death toll in World War One. This was mainly down to their naivety, ineptness and how out of touch they really were. There loss of seeing things for how they really were, was another reason why there army lost so many of their men. In some cases it seemed the army were being sent in blind, as the officers refused to change their old fashioned
Therefore he would not listen to other wise diplomats, such as Talleyrand. His ego and ambition got in the way of common sense and this helped to lead to his downfall and he tried the impossible, like invading Russia. Napoleon's method of enforcing his rule and ideas on all the countries he defeated also helped turn countries against him. This is because they did not always like the French way of living and this caused the people to feel bitter towards Napoleon. There are also a couple of larger factors that led to Napoleon's downfall.
This was the factor which doomed the Directory to failure, no matter when it happened. This was aggravated by the circumstance absolutely no real, political efforts being made to make it work. Neither extreme knew what it wanted. The right wing did support monarchy, but not an absolute one. On the other hand, the left might have wanted more control at the centre and more equality throughout France, but not the rural based leveling of Babeuf.
What Made The French Revolution So Radical? The French path to democracy was not easy and many were killed during this time of transition from an absolute monarchy to a democracy. When studying the French Revolution, one quickly finds out that this conflict was filled with violence and bloodshed between countrymen. While there are hundreds of reasons the revolution was so radical, it is possible to identify and narrow down the most important causes. With France as an absolute monarchy in which the king, queen, aristocrats\noblemen, and clergy greatly benefited.
The images that were broadcasted all over America did not please the public and before long riots and protests were being held in the streets to end the war. This was because hundreds of American soldiers had died in a war they thought was coming to an end. The Tet Offensive proved otherwise and caused a major disagreement between the public and the American government. Many people believe that this almost forced the government to end the war because without the moral support from their own country there would be no chance in another. On the other hand, the Americans actually won the fight and in doing so managed to kill thousands of Vietcong’s, unmasked Vietcong’s, which they had not been able to do very well until this point.
Essentially, if there are more and more refugees coming in, there will be social unrest which means that the social stability will go down. Since the refugees can’t get any jobs due to many barriers, they can not habituate well within the society. If refugees don’t have many skills to have a job, they will be economically unstable. This can later lead to a very serious problem; It could cause the increase of crime rates such as drug dealing, robbery, and terrors. Most of the Americans said that the United States should not accept any Syrian refugees into the country in the wake of the recent terrorist attacks in Paris, siding with many Republican lawmakers and against the White House on the issue.