Some may begrudge a colleague for doing a task a certain way because they think it is wrong but in another culture it is considered acceptable . Our life experiences have most likely affected the way we think about people and we all have our own personal like and dislikes too .All this can have a significant effect on how we think of things. It is unlikely that we can
Appiah, in his Moral Disagreement essay, provides a valid answer to this question, “The point is not that we couldn’t argue our way to one position or the other on this question; it’s only to say that when we disagree, it won’t always be because one of us just doesn’t understand the value that’s at stake” (p. 666). Just because different cultures eat different things, even something you might call a pet, it means you shouldn't judge them for it. Another point that comes across in Gender, Class, and Terrorism is the understanding of religion. Kimmel states, “The journalist Nasra Hassan interviewed families of Middle Eastern suicide bombers (as well as some failed bombers themselves) and found that none of them had the standard motivations ascribed to people who commit suicide, such as depression” (p. 652). This is because these bombers weren’t depressed.
Now it is considered offensive and unusual, therefore deviant. It can be difficult to give a clear definition of deviance as a lot of it depends on people’s values and opinions. What one person views as deviant behaviour another may view as normal. Also deviant behaviour is not always bad; there is good and odd deviant behaviour. This makes it harder to define as classifying behaviour requires taking a moral standpoint and judging.
BIlly Bill English-2 Only certain people would do the same as Brutus in Julius Caesar. If one feels truly passionate for an idea or cause, one would do just about anything to preserve the possibility of fulfilling that cause. Although, one’s loyalty to something will often cause them to do something desperate and sometimes even illegal to alter the end result. When an individual does something like this they often consider that the end result might not be agreed upon now, but is ultimately for the greater good. Many people rationalize that if the end justifies the means that is okay to do something.
Even though these two men have differences of have they provided there point of view to the society but they also had similarities of how they made their points across to society. Even though Socrates and Dr. King have two points of views, they are similar in many eyes of society today. Both having families knowing the risk and dangers they would come across if they would continue to proceed in what they believed in and felt was right they still proceeded. With having the idea of danger in their minds they both believed in good morals thus went about their matter in an unjust way. With having this great ideas meant harm to their self.
He argues that college pressures take away from the experience as a whole; that students are, then, more focused on attaining a secure future rather than truly appreciating the college atmosphere. He argues that college pressures cause “violence [to be] done to the undergraduate experience” (Zinsser 471). His opinion, though, is fairly biased in that it excludes the benefits of such pressure in the long run. Although college pressures may inflict short-term distress, in the long run, these pressures are not only necessary, but also valuable. Pressure such as this is beneficial as it plays a very significant role in the motivation for greater achievement.
Traditionally most moral theories have been written through some form of coherentism. Recently, people have started to worry about the practicality of moral theories, as it would seem that they cannot be applied in real life situations. Philosophers such as Susan Wolf have attacked the ideals of traditional moral theories. The problems of moral theory have been the main focus of most philosophers, but there is another problem in modern moral philosophy. There are so many conflicting theories that it makes it almost impossible to choose what the moral thing to do would be.
These side effects may affect one person but not another. This would be hard to study as you can not say it is exactly one thing, and then you would have to look at the extraneous variables which affect each problem. However, this could also be good as it is not really being reductionist in its own approach; it is looking at all the possible individual differences. If choosing a different approach, like cognitive, then it would still be difficult because you do not know what the person is thinking. You would have to rely on the patient giving you the information for it not is socially desirable or have demand characteristics.
Running head: PERSONAL VALUES IN RELATION TO KUDLER FINE FOODS Personal Values in Relation to Kudler Fine Foods Rachel Theodor University of Phoenix Personal Values in Relation to Kudler Fine Foods When thinking of personal values, initially these may seem easy to define. This, however, may not be the case when someone is required to make ethical decisions and put these personal values into play. Ethical decision-making is not always cut and dry. Personal values may be clear, but the process by which they are used in ethical decision-making may be more complex. People seem to hold certain values as their core belief, but many times these values overlap or become extended when dealing with ethical decision making.
Licensing is supposed to create a boundary in separating people who know how to do the job from people who do not. Young (2002) argues that occupational licensing has many flaws. He stated that it raises prices and does not prove concretely that having a license insures better quality or safety. Also, the requirements usually do not insure “good practice.” The law places more attention to non-licensed practitioners than licensed practitioners who malpractice. Occupational Licensing requires schooling, courses, training, and other obstacles in order for people to practice their specialty.