“The Passing Of Grandison”: Breaking Apart The Ste

1373 Words6 Pages
Much of the literature written during the late nineteenth century marks a transition in African American history, as a lot of the literature brings to light truths and information that normally one might not be aware of when it came to slaves and the plantation life. Authors, such as Charles Chesnutt, created stories that use literary devices such as satire, irony and symbolic situations to relay messages and to comment upon the the treatment and life of the African American people during their enslavement. The definition of a satire refers to making fun of or ridiculing a human shortcoming with the intent of enlightenment or correcting the subject of the satirical attack. In Charles Chesnutt’s “The Passing of Grandison”, the focus of the satirical nature rests upon the popular conceptions of the old plantation life at the time. Chesnutt also creates situations and characters that are brimming with irony with the intention to show the reader an exaggerated depiction of master-slave relationship. Certain symbols that Chesnutt uses are not necessarily represented by objects but rather the characters and their actions and are meant to symbolize some of the more prominent themes of the story such as the trickster, appearance versus reality and the idea of the mask. The analysis of the above mentioned components will help to identify one of the major aspects of “The Passing of Grandison” which is distinguished by the fact that Chesnutt is and African American who is creating an ironic portrayal of the slaves and plantation life. The purpose of creating a story with such an exaggeration of plantation figures, like the Colonel and Dick, and telling it with such an ironic and satirical intention, is to provide a form of social critique that shows how blinded to reality most people were during this time. Irony is very prominent throughout “The Passing of
Open Document