I also didn’t like that we didn’t find out where the real Megan was. It would’ve been better for the plot because she was a major section of the story and her genuine celebrity would’ve been beneficial to the overall movie. I approve this movie was a good choice for this certain class, but I would not recommend looking this movie with my friends on a Friday
Both versions have similarities, but at the same time those similarities contrast both movies to show just how different they really are. The original sets a guideline for the plotline, scenes, and characters, but the remake of the movie added its own twist on those three categories. Another difference, and probably the most drastic, is the differences in the portrayals of the characters. In the original, the main character seemed to focus more on the production and magnitude of the movie he is producing. The main character was focused on making a movie that people will remember, rather than making a movie to get him rich.
I found I could relate to what the author was saying about being a teenager and many of the studies and information she gives were interesting and I found myself saying oh that’s true, teenagers do, do that. Also the fact that I am comparing fiction to non-fiction was a plus because it would make this project much simpler. I was also surprised to find so many similarities between the movie and book. Some of the things Rosalind Wiseman writes are used word for word in the movie. And the only key difference I could find was that as I mentioned before, the book is non-fiction while the movie is fiction.
I think that the movie was good in concept but it was a slow movie to watch due to the lack of immediate action. Although not everything in the movie was bad. Even though the movie had a slow start and was lacking in color it had a good plot. The story of a small town boy becoming a war hero is very popular and can be a great success. The movie could have improved by providing more realistic explosions in battle and if the actors talked slower and more clearly so the audience might understand them better.
Because of technology being so significant, we tend to use as much of it as possible in movies, or adding as many special effects and unique graphics. For instance, now in theatres, 3-D movies are the new trend, they keep the audience engaged with the movie. As for movies in the mid 1900’s, technology was not so varied, so the movies had no choice but to be basic. Currently, Movies in the 21st century are filled with adult (sexually explicit) content, profanity, and even blood and gore. Alfred Hitchcock’s “The Birds”, portray an unnoticed view of these elements.
The movie wasn’t as dramatic as the book, but I bet it still made an affect on different people. I would recommend this book to anyone because of the great
That’s what I think. My general overview of the similarities and differences are that there really isn’t much difference in the movie and the book. I think they are basically the same from the beginning to end. I think the differences are little details. Other than that, I think it is the best book I’ve read.
The Movie Mean Girls Everyone is capable to think and share their ideas to others; however, those ideas need to be related to each other. Expressing thoughts give a more relief while we said it, even though others may not be interested in that situation. The act of expressing ideas paved a way to communication in the first place. People find their selves discouraged, when freedoms of expression were not allowable, but it is entirely a different situation. Communication viewed as an important element in the movie “The Mean Girls”.
I would like this movie, to be just how the book was. An actual young Clarisse, the real Mildred etc. From my personal opinion, the movie just needs to be more realistic and better actors. This book is just so real on how books aren’t being used as much and how the time changes. People all have their own opinions, but its you as the director to decide what changes will be
English 67 Comparison Sample Essay I Give It An “A” Many people argue that the book is always better than the movie. They will tell you that the written page offers something that the cinematic one can't, that a movie always leaves out details that the book contains, and that key elements of the original story are often missing in the film version. And these book lovers are often right. But in the case of Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter and Will Gluck's Easy A (which is loosely based on Hawthorne's novel), the latter speaks to the modern audience in ways the original never saw coming. Yet, they share two very similar heroines, and offer messages about what it's like to be an outcast.