The New Historicism Approach of Only Yesterday

789 Words4 Pages
History has multiple meanings, one of them is “knowledge of the past”. George Santayana’s line, “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”, implies that we are compelled to be able not to repeat same mistake steps and thus, compelled to remember the past. We can “remember” or at academic fashion, learning, by researching the literatures that were written in the past. Traditionally, approach methods of the literature research exclude non-fiction source as its subject. However, in the last two decades of twentieth century, Stephen Greenblattt introduce new term known as “New Historicism” approach that combines both fiction and non-fiction source to discern events and conditions at certain eras. New Historicism approach sees both (fiction and non-fiction) works at the certain ranges of time systematically related and tries to relate them. In this paper, I am trying to analyze literature works with the said kind of approach. According to the notes of M. H. Abrams, A Glossary of Literary Terms on R. Ebelle Essay about Defining New Criticism and New Historicism said ‘New Historicism sees the author as subject to the forces of culture that he or she works within. New Historicism also sees readers, like authors, as subjects to dominant ideology who tend to read texts in ways that confirm their own (culturally mediated) experience’. It meant New Historicism is not just about the series of event or facts which related to the history. But, to extract a special description about human reality and evolution of preconceived idea. From the notes of Abram’s saying, we can imply that, as I have said in the first paragraph, New Historicism sees both works as subject of approach. More specifically, this approach sees “the author’s work and the conditions the author lived while making his or her work as an influence to the author’s works”. To analyze literature
Open Document