Bush’s speech heavily contributed to the use of his tones. Throughout the speech he uses relatively simple language; This was done so that he could unite the citizens of America and give them a sense of fearfulness. He did this by using Anaphora and constantly using words such as “our”, “us” and “we”. The use of these words made people realize that America is in this together as a nation, and in this case no one is an outsider or minority as they are all fighting against one common threat. Those words that were used by Bush are also essential because they represent solidarity.
In this paper, Danial’s thesis seems to be clear on what he is going to write about. Danial is explaining how citizenship can save America through Barber; the author. He points out some strong statements where he is able to back up it up. As Danial explained ”Every nation in the world looked at America with admiration and not only did they respect America, but they believed in the leadership offered by America. The leadership did not come from the government however; it came from hard working citizens who were more concerned about the well being of their nation than their own lives” (2).
“The American flag is a cherished symbol of our national aspirations. It is the closest object to a national icon, rivaled only by the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence… what is the harm in insisting a modicum of respect for it” (Allen 18). Allen feels that the flag is a very important symbol to the nation and thinks that everybody should show respect towards it. The tone used to describe his reasoning is very fierce, as Allen points out the wrongs in the decision. Even though Allen thinks that the Supreme Court wasn’t wrong in their decision, his opinion is very strong, as he suggests how people should treat the flag with respect because of its importance.
Many countries and people probably did as well. On paper it appears that England would win without a doubt; they had all the means necessary for a victorious win over the colonists. When people come together to fight over a common cause, it is amazing what can happen. This is proven true by the outcome of the War for Independence. America won not because they had better soldiers, more supplies and weapons, or better fighting styles.
The answer is yes! Palin has described her party platform as "the right agenda for America" because of its "respect for equality and respect for life and an acknowledgment that it is individual Americans and American families who can make better decisions for ourselves than government can ever make for us" and stated that "individual freedom and independence is extremely important to me and thats why I'm a Republican. Even though Palin claims to respect equality and individuality, she is still a strong social conservative. She supports creationism being taught in public schools, opposes same-sex marriage, and is pro life... but thats ok because none of those things have anything to do with equality. The Bible says that marriage is the union of a man and a
He talks about without faith all this nothing, faith will bring a country together creating a world were all individuals are equal and that his is ultimate goal and his true passion To conclude his speech he takes lines from one of the most famous songs in America, “My country Tis of thee” he says one day we can sing it will a new meaning. The new meaning that we are proud of our country, how can you have a passion for a country that allows lynching and injustice treatment? When you sing it you will one day take pride and hold your head up high. Then He begins to yell “let freedom ring” and that he did. He names different parts of the world from New york to Coloardo to Tennesese, “from, every mountain side let freedom ring”.
We just want to be better than anyone else. It’s in our American nature. There are a lot of countries full of pride, and they will be ready for anything that comes their way. Anyone would fight for what they believe in they would feel proud of their country and wouldn’t let others ideas get in between theirs. Many were told that they weren’t going to get anything by coming to America, but they followed their dreams and headed towards America.
Starting with agreeing on the Pledge and what it stands for. The phrase “under God” stood for so many good things. When Eisenhower put that in the Pledge, it was not only based on his believes but while going and coming out a war, the words were to unite us as people and a nation. At that time God and as well now, stands for positive and prosperous things. I think Eisenhower meant well by it, but now in the day and age we are in, opinions and personal beliefs are more voiced and expressed.
Mitt Romney were both nominated to be the presidential candidate of their respected parties because they were the best fit and had the best goals for the United States. Their acceptance speeches each showed why they were the best men for the job. However, President Obama’s and Mitt Romney’s speeches had some striking similarities to go along with the obvious differences between them. For instance, in both of their speeches Obama and Romney emphasized that the people are what make America. Obama stated, “The people make it possible” and “people give me hope” while Romney also said that the “strength of America is based on its communities and people”.
Roosevelt, he wrote “This nation takes great satisfaction and much strength from the things which have been done to make its people conscious of their individual stake in the preservation of democratic life in America. Those things have toughened the fiber of our people, have renewed their faith and strengthened their devotion to the institutions we make ready to protect” What Roosevelt meant by this is that because of all of the benefits of living in our country and the fact that people get to do what they want to do, it helps us stay together as a union and as a whole, because the people know that a brighter future is ahead of us. We are all