The Movie Krakatoa: the Last Days Analysis

780 Words4 Pages
Krakatoa: The Last Days The movie “Krakatoa: The Last Days”, released in 2006, is a movie that is a secondary source. Even though this documentary is based on four-eyewitness account that experienced the horrors of the Krakatoa eruption in 1883, it was made to create the events according to the accounts that they made. This movie is delivering information taken from the primary sources (eyewitness accounts and journals) to tell the story and the exact incidents that happened during that time. To make it a more primary source, they should have showed the written words from the eyewitness, or a photo of the aftermath taken by someone. In this movie, the primary sources used were the accounts of scientist Rogier Verbeek, who described the progress of the Krakatoa and the eruption in detailed. The accounts used also included those of Johanna Beyerinck, A Dutchman’s wife who was the leader of Ketimbang District in South Sumatra, and also of Captain Johan Linderman, a ship captain who have more than 100 passengers in the ship trapped at sea when the volcano eruption was at its highest. I think that the movie may supports what other sources conclude about Indonesia at the time because all movies tried to make it as historically accurate as possible. I would not say that it is a reliable source though because they could make a mistake and have some things chronologically off. The equipment and objects in the movie seemed like they belong in that time. The benefits of using this film it gives the audience a good visual on the event of the Krakatoa eruption. There is no video or photos about the eruptions so could only imagine the damage it causes. With this, we have a picture in our mind and see how bad the damage actually is. Watching this movie also helps understand the colonial life in Indonesia, and how the Dutch interacts with the Indonesians. There are also some

More about The Movie Krakatoa: the Last Days Analysis

Open Document