“Most Dangerous Game Essay” In the suspenseful short story, “The Most Dangerous Game”, there are many literary elements evident. The suspenseful theme throughout the story keeps the reader' s attention as imagery , foreshadowing and characterizations shape the unexpected outcomes. Richard Connell, the author, takes the reader to a dark and cruel ‘palatial chateau’, to meet a man so sinister and ‘bizarre’. The hunting game played is deadly, cruel and inhumane. Characterization is the act of creating and developing a character and they can be both direct and indirect.
Elijah Thom Mrs.Irving/Mrs.Bell/Ms.L 9th Lit/Comp Character Analysis How does a man escape the Blade of a maniac? Well in this story (The Most Dangerous Game), a man named Rainsford tries to do just that. Not without the necessary skills that is. Rainsford uses his wit and judgment to escape. In the story, Rainsford shows extraordinary cunning.
The story The Most Dangerous Game is a suspenseful story about a man, who could be called a serial killer, and his sick, twisted sport. Richard Connell is very good at building suspense to keep readers enticed. When a reader reads this story there is not one single time that they will be bored and want to stop reading. There are many points in the story that build suspense. Rainsford is up a tree on the first night of the hunt, when Zaroff walks into view.
Because Doyle thought he had ended his series with “The Final Problem,” he had to find a very clever way to bring Holmes back when his readers demanded it. In “The Empty House,” Holmes explains that he was never dead and that he had faked his death for three years now. They then try to find who had killed Adair, the victim. At the end of the story, Holmes captures the killer and saves the day, once again. Of course, knowing that Doyle had to figure out a good way to bring back Holmes, it was hard to believe at times while reading “The Empty House, but I give credit to Doyle for doing so in a way no one else could.
“Thou shalt not kill” is one of the Ten Commandments, however, as with all rules there are exceptions. In the case of self-defense such as “The Most Dangerous game” or doctor assisted suicide killing is acceptable. In the two short stories “The Most Dangerous Game” and “Lather and Nothing Else” the authors explore the potential ramifications of murder. In a “kill or be killed” situation, instinct for survival comes first. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Zaroff and his accomplice, Ivan, hunt an innocent man named Rainsford.
His short, choppy sentences cause a feeling of hurry, much like the character would have been facing in the story. The author also uses a comparison between light and dark to allude to the contrast between the known and the unknown. The fact that the story takes place in the dark, with light emerging comes to reveal something about the character. The sniper, while waiting to kill his opponent, is enveloped in darkness, much like he’s enveloped in uncertainty. As he kills his enemy and the light emerges, the light is shone upon his situation, revealing a tragically ironic twist.
Just as in “The Tortoise and the Hare”, the hare from the start is confident of his ability to defeat the tortoise because of his characteristics and abilities. Thinking his hasting would cause him to get ahead, the hare finds himself behind. A wise man once said “haste makes waste” and in this case it is so true (Milleray, 2013). Storytelling has long held an important role in history. People have passed down stories from generation to generation.
Allowing the Montresor to speak freely and explain his dark secret in juicy detail. This pulls the reader in, they want to read more. This helps the reader to see inside the dark depths of Montresor's mind, who we later on learn is a killer. When talking about the past insults of Fortunato, the reader takes notice to Montresor's drastic change of tone, “..I must not only punish, but punish with impunity...” (Poe, 402). This clearly foreshadows what is to come, but not into
My aim for this was to cause shock, which is similar to the horror created in my dystopian – as this was an opinion article, to gain the shock I wanted I used statistics, rhetorical questions, strong dynamic verbs and negative modal verbs. I chose to write about this subject as it has the theme of survival depending on who you are and what you believe which is similar to my dystopian. The main reason I chose to use the noun phrase ‘The Occurrence’ as my title to my literary piece is because it is short and snappy; although it is the main event and causes the horror that is exhibited in my piece, the title doesn’t give anything away. This contributes to my aim of engaging attention and wanting the reader to read on and not lose interest. The title of my non-literary piece ‘Survival of the Fittest or Survival of the Greatest’ is two comparative statements connected by the contrastive conjunction ‘or’.
They can be that his stories are amazing, dark and deep. That he shaped the English language we know today, and also that his writing style itself was so beautiful that other writers can recognize that as well. The question I think needs to be answered is: Why is Shakespeare so important, and why is he still relevant today? Shakespeare genuinely tried to write for his audiences. He wanted the plot to strike them even if it didn’t sit well with them.