Later in the story, a man named Zaroff, a human hunter, and Rainsford are talking in Zaroff’s chateau “Thank you I’m a hunter not a murderer” Rainsford said to Zaroff (14). Rainsford in this conversation tells how much he cares about hunting and says there’s a difference between those two. As a result, he doesn’t like to be considered a murderer. At the end, Zaroff and Rainsford are at Zaroff’s chateau talking, “I am still a beast at bay, [Rainsford says] in a low, hoarse voice.” (22). No one can hold him back from hunting although Rainsford hunted animals, he probably felt the adrenaline rush of being hunted.
The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell focuses mainly on Sanger Rainsford, the protagonist, who realistically is no better than the predator, General Zaroff. The initial feelings of Rainsford towards animals show him to be cold and unfeeling. The location of the events are equally important as it impacts what the reader’s imagination and emotions will be while reading the events that take place. They also influence the theme and set the serious mood of the story. The narrator is separate from the story, (told in third person limited) and the reader is mostly only aware of Rainsfords thoughts and feelings until the story climaxes, then the game changes.
In the beginning of the story Rainsford seems to present himself as a gentlemen but by the end he seems very uncivilized. As an example, “he cowered back,”(13) as a dog would, a human doesn't tend to cower. Rainsford's “impulse was to hurl himself down like a panther,”(12) humans don't usually have the urge to attack other people in such a way. Rainsford's thoughts show the arising animal inside him. “I played the fox, now I must play the cat of the fable,”(11) shows Rainsford comparing himself to two different wild animals.
“Most Dangerous Game Essay” In the suspenseful short story, “The Most Dangerous Game”, there are many literary elements evident. The suspenseful theme throughout the story keeps the reader' s attention as imagery , foreshadowing and characterizations shape the unexpected outcomes. Richard Connell, the author, takes the reader to a dark and cruel ‘palatial chateau’, to meet a man so sinister and ‘bizarre’. The hunting game played is deadly, cruel and inhumane. Characterization is the act of creating and developing a character and they can be both direct and indirect.
To General Zaroff it means nothing. He sees humans merely as animals and believes they may be hunted as such simply so he can rid himself of his boredom. Being of noble decent he values some people’s lives more than others as he sees himself and others of a similar status to be above some others, which is made clear when Zaroff states “‘I hunt the scum of the earth—sailors from tramp ships—lascars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels’” (19). However, he has no qualm
This is said to show the English that their wars are not justified and that all problems should be worked out by word of mouth and not by violence. Also the Whynm points out that to fight over land is foolish and asks why everyone can not just share the land. This is written to be a question toward society asking why they must have wars over land and why it is important to have land of your own when one can share it with others. In this adventure satire is used because in our world we treat horses as stupid but in this particular adventure, they are very wise. This part of the story was meant to show the leaders of that time how irrational going to war was.
The Hunter or The Hunted Suspense entices readers when reading stories to continue reading on, and it keeps them interested in the story. In Richard Connell’s story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” the reader is fascinated with the narrative and with the increase of tension and suspense in the story, so much that he must read on. Richard Connell makes effective use of literary devices, particularly powerful foreshadowing and vivid imagery, to increase tension and suspense in the reader. Richard Connell employs powerful foreshadowing to cause the reader to feel suspense in the story. In the beginning of the story, Whitney’s consideration of the fear of the prey and Rainsford’s dismissal illustrates foreshadowing.
Why did the author spend so much space in what seems to be just action scenes? Unquestionably such a talented author would never carelessly spend time on lines that do not add meaning to the story. One critic's overzealous opinion is: all the hunted animals convey connotations of evil, and this is doubtless the reason why the author of the poem seems so involved in the outcome of the hunts and never tires of triumphantly describing the final slaying of the pursued animals. (Howard 85) This is an interesting interpretation and could possibly serve as a religious meaning in the poem. Nevertheless the animals themselves are never described as evil nor is there any implication of evil animals in the poem.
As a leader, he forgets about himself and only argues animals to pay attention to their miserable life, encouraging them to rebel. Another great example of a humble leader is Martin Luther King as he gives his life serving others. “If a man has not discovered something that he will die for, he isn't fit to live.” – Martin Luther King, Jr. furthermore, he was killed for his dream of justice and equality. Humble leadership empowers others, so humility is a great feature in any great
People conform to the ideals that surround them to be accepted by the herd, but almost as equally destructive is the general fear of speaking out even when you know something’s wrong; to let your voice be heard despite the savage contesters. This is where humanity went wrong. We all hold the choice in our hands to dig ourselves out of this quickly sinking grave, but so far no one has chosen that path. We could turn off the TV, burn the tabloids, and put away the goofy trends. Thoreau once wrote, “Most men lead lives of quiet desperation”, and he was right.