At the Battle of Mons, the advancing Germans believed that they were under fire from British machine guns. In fact, it was the well drilled infantry of the BEF using their standard issue Lee Enfield. A good infantryman would expect to shoot off about twelve well-aimed bullets in a minute. These two examples of weaponry use is significant as it shows how the Crimean war was a turning point to land warfare, both of the wars are similar in that they both use rifles, however as time went on the weapons had been improved. However since the Crimean war rifles have been used in many wars, and been chosen over the use of muskets.
Ancient Chinese and Roman warfare were similar but also differed in the ways they were implemented, employed and strategized. Both the Chinese and Roman militaries proved themselves worthy of being the absolute best militaries of their time. They were capable of taking on any battle in any given situation and were repeatedly victorious. Their methods of war included the use of clever strategies, powerful tactics and organized formations to overcome and defeat their opponents. The book, Art of War, reveals several aspects of Chinese military warfare that differs from the Romans.
A standard way that the Emperors used their power was for military purposes. Because Rome was a large and thriving empire; a strong army was needed for equally attacking and defending against opposition. Emperors could effortlessly find new recruits for enlistment to the Roman legions. This would provide the advantage of larger numbers of soldiers in a battle. This benefit allowed tactics such as the ‘wedge’ to be executed as more soldiers could reinforce the wedge from behind, which would consequently break the enemies’ formation (Roman Empire.net 2012).
Repeating rifles, machine guns, and high powered artillery was expected to shorten war time. The new weapons did the opposite; they prolonged war time and allowed huge loses of lives. Machine guns could mow enemy soldiers down form a distance. This act is seen clearly in the battle scenes of All Quite on the Western Front. Shelling also became very popular during this war.
With many of the new weapons created and put in use had helped make some countries a super power and helped the outcome of the next would war and any other wars next to come in the future. Some of the major weapons created in the span of the war were machine guns that helped give sides a major edge, trench warfare which proved to be a complex system, but very dangerous, and chemical warfare which was interesting because it proved to be a real secret weapon to many countries because it had a power unlike any other to be able to kill you not instantly, but over a period of time. These are a couple of reasons why these things proved to be important to the World War One era. These inventions remain to be used it todays wars showing that these discoveries had a large impact in warfare in a
The musket, armed with its bayonet as well as the cannon proved to be worthy weaponry advancements in the infantry together with various pistols. The Civil War introduced the revolving pistol as well as the Gatling gun which enabled soldiers to produce rapid fire and destroy enemies in large quantities with a single round. New technological advancements in transportation such as the railroad, enabled large quantities of troops to travel to a given area in nearly half the amount of time. However, the turn of the twentieth introduced new technological advancements in the country as well as the military. This ignited a century of technological advancements in the military that has enabled the United States to excel in militaristic domination.
The Mesopotamians were the first to use chariots in war, in 2400 BC. The chariot diffused fast to other human societies all over the world, mainly because it had become an efficient military weapon (Publins, 2013). The Hittites, for instance, relied on it to establish their first Kingdom in 1700 BC. By 1300 BC, the chariot had already penetrated into China from the Northwest. Since the kingdoms and societies using this vehicle in war were found to be superior based on the size of their chariots, it became a master weapon and spread all over the world within a short time.
Even though the Roman Empire was strong, there was one major problem in the Empire, which would be its over expansion that caused both Empire and the republic became unstable and eventually broke down. The Roman Empire was said to be the strongest empire that was ever built. The empire controlled and ruled the largest area in European history for over a thousand years, covering about 2.2 million square miles across Europe. Their military had several advantages such as rapid development of the latest technology and due to their advanced engineering skills of the Romans in building roads. Their roads had a strong stone surface which also allowed water to run off to the sides.
Have so much adrenaline you cant stop your body from shaking, the thrill of shooting something within 30 yards and gaining that different type of respect for that animal, and the challenge of getting that perfect shot on it because you know that there may not be another shot. There are all sufficient reasons why I think that bow hunting is a greater challenge then rifle hunting is. Why bow hunting is better than rifle hunting. You get more of an adrenaline (describe movements and details) seasons so much longer. You get more of a thrill shooting something within
Soldiers with a good throwing arm would use lead weighted darts. Artillery was also a reason for many Roman victories in battle. The Scorpio, carroballista, and occasionally the catapulta would shoot bolts at enemies. The onager and the catapulta would fling large boulders. The Romans were actually quite famous in their time period because of their advanced, protective armor.