The first one is that our rights are not well enough protected. If we had a written constitution with a proper Bill of Rights, as they have in America, we would feel safer and more sure that we would be protected from governments that wish to take too much power. We have lost many of our rights in the UK and this is because we do not have a written Bill of Rights and because government and Parliament have too much uncontrolled power. Another argument is that the people of the UK would feel more patriotic and identify more with politics if there was a written and codified constitution as they have in the USA. Every American citizen knows about their constitution and they are proud of it.
In the end he says that in order to have a balanced government the majority must agree on justice. The historical significance of this article is, during this time if no separation of powers or checks and balances were enforced the government would have collapsed. If the powers were not limited; with time a certain person would end democracy and bring forth once again a tyranny government. It is also important that the government was equal yet had power to control its people because if not there would be no type of
Limited government's responsibility and gave the individual convinced rights that neither the government nor majority could infringe on. The Constitution was initially written without the Bill of Rights and many Founding Fathers would not sign it since they feared that the federal government would be too powerful. It is important because each citizen should know the background of each rule in their country and the history between the decisions that the leaders and politicians made through the past. In conclusion, the bill of rights has a huge importance and impact in the life of an US citizen. It l help you to be politically active; helps to address significant issues and show the history of the systems through decisions as giving the states more defined rights.
This was most likely why the British government did not support the plan, as it would have given the colonists even more power to self govern, and would have allowed the Colonies to have more power of taxation during a time where Britain was beginning to levy more taxes on them. However, had
The Role of the People The government of the United States of America has not always been in agreement as to what role the people should take in the government. Following the American Revolutionary War, a new government was needed in order to start governing the people. This caused some rifts to begin to form among some of the most influential people in U.S. history. The most common rift that formed was over the idea of the role of the people in the government. Although many believed that the people should have direct impact on the governing body of the nation, others believed that this was not an important idea to consider.
Democratic Republicans all in all wanted things to remain the same in the U.S government because they felt that giving more power to the national government by way of national bank or tax would slowly get rid of the people’s voice in politics creating a rerun of the previous outcome with Great Britain. Both party’s with opposite beliefs going back and forth has followed the U.S since this time in history it is safe to say that the First Party System left behind a legacy of feuding in government politics. When it comes to decision
Particularly in the internet age, it is increasingly difficult to keep all personal and private information completely secure. However, the federal government does afford American citizens a variety of different privacy rights protected under privacy laws. While it has become somewhat easier to gain access to private information, the federal government has also sought out ways to increase protection in terms of privacy. Additionally, American citizens are constantly looking for ways to increase their own level of privacy (Bartee, 2006). Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961), was a significant case that illustrates the fine line the federal government walks when trying to protect the privacy of Americans while also trying to uphold Constitutional law.
For this reason, municipal court laws are junior so long as the federal rule is official (constitutional). There are some exception, for example, States are giving more latitude to enforce education at their level of discretion as long as it follows basic federal educational agendas. There should be more government involvement since this policy is more geared at a national level of concern. Education and health should lead to superior power of force than local government because our society is conscious of how local government permits and can be manipulated by belief, cultures and customs. According to Cropf (2008), Local government is the level of government nearest to the public; most Americans have far more interaction with their local governments than with the state or national levels of
The Constitution was also called the "Great Experiment” because at this time most Americans were pro-monarch and people were used to it because they were controlled by the King of Great Britain. Being controlled by the people and self governed was a radical concept and people were not use to it. The Constitution had a series of authors which took concepts from several philosophers and other societies to make the Constitution something that would satisfy everyone for a long time. Philosophers and writers like Locke and Montesquieu had ideas from governments like those of Greece and Rome. These countries and famous writers and philosophers inspired the creation of our Constitution.
Citizens should be encouraged to embrace their citizenship, and not merely as a duty, but as a meaningful opportunity to participate in their own government for the sake of common good and in building the culture of life. In addition, it is an exercise of significant individual power. Now, most Americans will tell you that our politicians have all the power, but I disagree. Although it is true that our politicians do make the laws, here in the United States of America, the people have the authority. If an individual does not vote, then that individual cannot argue or comment on the outcome of what our politicians do.