Point #2: Tariffs protect American jobs and wages. (Points: 13) I find this position to be valid. Protective tariffs are designed to raise the retail price of imported products so that domestic goods are more competitively priced (Nickels, McHugh & McHugh, 2008, p. 76). Therefore, if products are competitively priced then the consumer will be more likely to purchase domestic products instead of imports. Since consumers will be more likely to support American vendors, this will keep the American businesses running and not force them to cut costs to compete with imports.
International Trade ECO 372 University of Phoenix There are many contributing factors to the stabilization and prosperity of our global market. We, the United States, are living in a time of severe trade deficit, meaning that we are importing many more goods than we are exporting. While it is nice to be able to buy foreign products at a lower price, there is risk in doing so. When we purchase foreign goods over domestic at lower prices it forces our domestic companies to sell their goods at lower prices to remain competitive. These lower prices may lend to making enough profit to sustain the current workforce.
I work two jobs and maintain my financial responsibility. My big payback is the government’s bad decision indirectly affecting my income. A more fair use of the $700 billion plan would have been to let those who took out loans known to be too much and the institutions that created the loan swim or sink. Then disperse the $700 billion to consumers like me who maintain our responsibility. I could certainly use a portion of the money and would most certainly spend it frivolously.
When there is a recessionary gap, expansionary fiscal policy does not makes things better, but worse. Fiscal policy causes interest rates to increase and the Canadian Dollar to appreciate; as a result, there is a decrease of net exports and a decline in the economy. However, expansionary monetary policy causes interest rates to fall, which will provoke international outflows of financial capital. This, in turn, lowers the value of the dollar and makes Canadian goods more desirable. “The net export effect of expansionary monetary policy will be in the same direction as the monetary policy effect”.1 Recommended Course of Action Although both fiscal policy and monetary policy prove to have beneficial effects on an economy during a contractionary period, we believe that the government should use a combination of both policies…… - The money supply may be ineffective, but in the end people want to make sure that they will have money to save up in case of emergencies.
“The most important provision of this act however is the prevention of anticompetitive mergers. This occurs when a company buys a competing firm. While most mergers allow the companies to create better quality goods at less expensive prices, some mergers limit competition and make price fixing easier. This part of the act was designed to prevent mergers from creating monopolies” (Ellsworth, 4). This section of the Clayton act wanted to promote free trade and keep smaller businesses from getting too greedy.
The theory is that jobs are lost when we are tempted by cheap foreign goods. The true effect of protectionism is it reduces consumer choice, raises prices of protected foreign products and domestic goods. This lowers worldwide production and may save some jobs in a specific industry within America but this comes at an expense of the total welfare of the country. Free trade would provide lower prices, higher-quality goods, economic growth, and competition. This policy eliminates competition and competition is needed for a balanced economy.
The less expansion, the less inflation. However, if the economy is slowing down, interest rates will decrease. This allows banks and businesses to borrow more cheaply, which results in them being able to higher more workers and produce more goods. The monitoring of inflation is very important in the US. Inflation has many negative affects.
In a highly competitive business world, on a firm’s priority list is the subject of increasing profit and reducing cost. One might than pose the question, has this put them out of business (mom and pop store)? The answer is absolutely not, but rather, they too benefit from cheaper prices as they continue to buy in bulk and continue to operate as the name suggest, convenient
Immigration Tariffs Make Good Economic Sense Emigrants moving to wealthier countries have historically been able to do so at very little or no cost. This has led to inefficiency in the allocation of resources. As Economist Gary Becker stated in his lecture to the Institute of Economic Affairs, there would be economic gains to be made by imposing an immigration tariff on immigrants who are granted work visas by the wealthy nations of the world. The economic concepts involved in Mr. Becker’s proposal include the basic principles of supply and demand, opportunity cost, and human capital. He proposes to create a market within the immigration systems of wealthier countries.
It uses Public money unnecessarily and is unfair to taxpayers. It makes financial reform going forward much more difficult. Protecting the markets for derivative products like CDOs and CDSs allows for a repeat of the risky practices that got us into the current crisis. And finally, by guaranteeing the corporate existence of large banks, we are maintaining their power and priorities and thus are not likely to see gains on predatory lending, foreclosure abuse, and other areas where reform is sorely needed. If we want to help the people who are suffering in this crisis and recession, then we should make financial policies with them directly in mind.