The Hummingbird Tree Vs. The Chrysalids

678 Words3 Pages
The Hummingbird Tree vs. The Chrysalids The West Indian novel The Hummingbird Tree by Ian McDonald and the non-west Indian novel The Chrysalids, by John Wyndham both depict subjects of some sort of prejudice. In The Hummingbird Tree, conflicts arise based on both social and racial differences; whereas, in The Chrysalids the root of the main conflict was a bridge between the orthodox and the unorthodox. The main characters: David Strorm in The Chrysalids and Alan Holmes in The Hummingbird Tree, both break the norms of their society in different ways. In The Hummingbird Tree, Alan, a small white boy, becomes friends with Kaiser and Jaillin, two poor Indian children that are hired as helpers in his wealthy household. Alan is initially naïve to the surrounding social influences that separate the poor from the upper-class. In his early years, he plays freely with Kaiser and Jaillin without consciousness of the strong influence of the upper-class community. The upper-class community looks down upon the dark-skinned Indians; they consider them as “vulgar”, for petty things like cooking over animal dung. But, in Alan’s young eyes, Kaiser and Jaillin are simply companions - where being poor or rich does not matter. Moreover, in The Chrysalids, the main character, David Strorm, is a boy who at an early age discovers that he can communicate telepathically with other children in his area who share the same gift. He lives in Waknuk, a community who abides by Puritan law. They make detailed descriptions of what is acceptable and what deviates the norm. The deviants, be it a person, animal, or crop, are eliminated from the community to strive for purity. An example of a character who was considered a ‘deviant’ was Sophie, David’s friend who had an extra toe. David befriended Sophie in the novel, and was also naïve to the fact that she was different. Furthermore, the two
Open Document