The Global Recession And Workplace Malfeasance

776 Words4 Pages
Dagmara Kalinowski MT302 Organizational Behavior Unit One: Case Incident 2 The Global Recession and Workplace Malfeasance 02/06/2012 1. Does this case prove economic downturns and company layoffs fail to lead to workplace malfeasance? Why or why not? This case deals mostly with individuals behavior and analyze what cause the employees/potential employees behavior to change. However it also depends from which side the problem is viewed. There are many reports of negative effects of the economic downturn and company layoffs, what can definitely lead to workplace malfeasance. “The Times of London” reported that U.S. job losses were directly linked to 58 fatalities in eight incidents during one month in 2009.” (Robbins&Judge,2011). I think that this results can not be called relevant if it is not compared to the number of work incidents leading to fatalities in the better economy situation. MSN Money,one of the bigger portals, under the headline “Businesses See Rise in Employee Theft,” also analyzed and reported the surveys results as follows: When asked if they had noticed a recent rise in monetary theft among employees, such as fraudulent transactions or missing cash, 18% said yes, 41% were unsure and the rest said they hadn’t.” - 18 percent agree that theft is up, and 82 percent either disagree or are unsure. This way the magazines were able to increase sells and profits, as readers are interested in buying negative information. 2. Does the case prove we can learn nothing from the business press? Definitely this case doesn’t prove that we can learn nothing from the business press. Even that the survey’s results suggests only a small minority of employers thought the recession had led to an increase in employee theft, the public media (newspapers, internet portals) reported the opposite result. Many times the
Open Document