The Dualist Conception of the Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law.

733 Words3 Pages
Is international law, ‘law’ if it doesn’t engage in states municipal law? , can both international law and municipal law collaborate to regulate inter-sate and intra-state relations? These among other questions are what the discipline of public international law seeks to answer. The relationship between international law and municipal law is usually a contested topic particularly when applying the monist and dualist theories nevertheless an analysis of the practical ideas posited by the dualist conception will be the principal of this paper. Based on the principles that international law is governed by, states are obligated to the treaties and agreements established moreover each states decides how such instruments would be applied in their national legal system concordant with their views on the relations between international law and municipal law. Therefore each state decides which conception to adopt whether its monist, dualist or convergence. The convergence theory has been undermined since it is not mentioned when looking at the relationship between municipal law and international law. This theory posits that municipal law and international law have a lot in common and would ultimately lead to a merger of the two systems. On the other hand, the monist theory claims that international law and domestic law are both apart of one universal legal order, “law” more precisely “natural law”. According to this theory both systems of law are subject to the law of nature and thus natural law is at the top, followed by international law and then domestic law. Hersch Lauterpacht who was a judge of the ICJ regarded international law superior to domestic law because he believed that international law was the best law to protect the human rights of individuals. Because monists consider international law and municipal law organisms of the same species , international law
Open Document