However, what most of us don’t know is that this agency is guilty of presenting deceptive and misleading arguments in promoting the current minimum legal drinking age. We, as citizens, have to question the legitimacy of their flawed arguments, and ask whether it is right that they include themselves in public and political debates. Furthermore, we have to really ask ourselves if lowering the legal drinking age to 18 is the right thing to do. Our nation has a severe problem with alcoholism. Banning 18-year-old adults from buying and consuming alcohol, has pushed adolescents behind closed doors and away from supervision by parents, residence life staff, and other adult authority figures.
Christian Kohler Term Paper “Nothing so needs reforming as other people’s habits” —Mark Twain Prohibition, a time when alcohol was illegal, did not sit well with the people. Inspired by a group of radical Protestants, Prohibition became the country’s 18th amendment and was bolstered with the help of the Volstead Act. Throughout America’s dry years, organized crime had its hand in the getting the people what they wanted. From the transportation, to the customer, organized crime made sure it was possible to get a drink. Also, besides alcohol, organized crime was also involved in city politics.
Gun Control is Not the Answer For many years now gun control has been a major issue. Many, individuals believe that if guns were strictly controlled that it would greatly reduce the amount of crime in the U.S. Although, this may be true it is not the answer to the problem. Stricter control of firearms is an infringement on all individuals Second Amendment rights. Not, only is it an infringement on peoples Second Amendment rights, it will also punish hunters and sportsman whom us firearms to hunt for enjoyment.
In most states it was and still is a felony to posses any marijuana or paraphernalia. A felony means mandatory jail time, huge fees, you can’t poses guns, and many businesses will not hire, not to mention all the other strict stipulations surrounding a conviction of a felony. Does it not seem extreme that a teacher would go to jail for smoking a joint, while rapists, thieves, and even worse criminals get off with probation. The current marijuana policies are in no way effective, menacing at best, ruining the lives of good citizens throughout our community. Prohibition has never helped, in any country, to solve or aid in the effort of cutting down marijuana use.
They also believe that the current laws are counter productive. (Jolley, 2008). Most young adults drink because it is illegal. They do it to be rebellious. Some
Prohibition in the United States was a national ban on the sale, production, and transportation of alcohol, in place from 1920 to 1933. [1] The dry movement was led by rural Protestants in both political parties and was coordinated by the Anti-Saloon League. The ban was mandated by the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and the Volstead Act set down the rules for enforcing the ban and defined the types of alcoholic beverages that were prohibited. Private ownership and consumption of alcohol was not made illegal under federal law, but in many areas local laws were stricter and some states banned possession outright. Prohibition ended with the ratification of the Twenty-first Amendment, which repealed the Eighteenth Amendment, on December 5, 1933.
Gun control ENG/102 8/11/10 Brian Kevin Gun control 1 Introduction: Gun control advocates have cried foul, because of the Supreme Court 2010 ruling they believe will damage the chances gun control laws to reduce crime. While many people consider gun control to be too restrictive, advocates are of the mind that we should remove all the guns, at all cost. The Supreme Court ruling has mandated that state and city governments have no choice but to respect the Second Amendment of their citizens. While the ruling does not completely abolish current gun restrictions, it does weaken the ability of the local government to
By forbidding him from the fruit, Adam wanted the fruit more. The second prohibition based on alcohol. In the thirties alcohol was ban from sell and distribution. The people protested by the use of the black market. Underground sales of alcohol and crime arose.
Although, drug-related crime might decrease and drug use will increase, if we just have criteria and enforce safe use of drugs, then society will have control of drug-use. "We believe that drug prohibition is the true cause of much of the social and personal damage that has historically been attributed to drug use. ", states Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), "It is prohibition that makes these drugs so valuable – while giving criminals a monopoly over their supply." From my perspective, there will always be rebellion. The more you tell someone not to do something, the more they are
The speed limit – it’s the same as drunk drivers, reckless speeders can also kill. The prohibition of drugs – dangerous to the user and society because drug abusers can do harm in their state of mind. Finally, the strong rule against stealing – it’s just not fair to anyone, especially those who work hard for their things. 2. The 5 rules I do not agree with in society are , the age a person is allowed to drink, the age should be increased – at eighteen the person is still immature and when a person of eighteen gets drunk there are usually problems involved such as drunk driving and aggressive behaviour towards others.