The Constitution of Uk Is Not Unwritten, It Is Written but Un-Codified. Give Your Arguments for and Against This Statement.

1715 Words7 Pages
Essay Topic: The constitution of UK is not unwritten, it is written but un-codified. Give your arguments for and against this statement. Every country have a constitution (either in written form or unwritten). In a simple clarification, there is no single country that does not have a constitution. But now a question can be arisen: ’what is constitution’ and ‘from where the word originates’? The term constitution comes through the French where the term 'constitutio' was primarily used to mean regulation and orders. From the dawn of modern civilization, constitutions are being written or created in countries to ensure ordinary citizens' rights, national security, set out the structure of the state, the major state institutions, and the principles governing their relations with each other and with the state’s citizens. Dicey (1915, 22) said about constitution, "All rules which directly or indirectly affect the distribution and exercise of the sovereign power in the state". Context of the above discussion, the following features of constitution are notable: * the choosing and removing of rulers; * the relationship between the different branches of govt.; * the accountability of govt.; * the rights of the citizen in relation to govt.; So it can be said, constitution is a set of rules regulating the powers of a country’s government and the rights and duties of its citizens. Classifying Constitutions: * Written Constitution: A written constitution is a formal document defining the nature of the constitutional settlement, the rules that govern the political system and the rights of citizens and governments in a codified form. * Ex: USA, Bangladesh * Rigid Constitution: The rigid constitution is the one which cannot be changed easily. Especial procedures need to be followed to
Open Document