To fit the population, dumbbell tenements and settlement houses were formed as a part of the progressive reformist social movement. Dumbbell tenements were cheap housing units created when cities became packed with people during the industrial revolution. They were called dumbbell tenements because the design of the building, which looked like a dumbbell, had many housing units sharing a corridor. Jane Addams responded to urban conditions by working to establish settlement houses that provided assistance to the poor. Jane Addams worked to aid the new immigrants in adjusting to American society by way of settlement houses, such as her Hull House in Chicago.
Two causes for this being the fact that land and housing costs are cheaper compared to cities, and higher property and business taxes have pushed businesses to the suburbs where taxes are typically low. Some argue that this could be positive for the growth of a local economy or the fact that it will do nothing but ruin the environment around us. Destruction of animal and plant life, the pollution it brings to the air, and the natural beauty of the wildlife being destroyed are just some of the reasons why so many citizens are opposed to this idea of "Urban Sprawl". Rural living areas on the other hand are not so much frowned upon. Houses are spread vastly apart leaving abundant room for gardens and fields.
This means that the majority of people living in the area are those who cannot afford to move away. As an urban area spirals into decline, it becomes a decreasing priority for both public and private investment, which results in a loss of industry as businesses move out. Consequences of this decline include poor quality housing, empty buildings and factories and high levels of pollution. Furthermore, social characteristics include high unemployment, crime rates and split families. Enterprise
How to Minimize Gang Activity in Housing Developments Gang activity in housing developments is a growing problem in today’s society. Many authorities are looking for ways to decrease this problem in order to make these certain housing developments safer and a feasible place to live. In order to fix this problem, we have to first figure out what a housing development is, who is in charge of them, what type of gangs are present in these housing developments, what problems exist and how to fix these problems to make the residents of the housing developments feel safer and continue their normal living. A housing development is a residential area in which the houses have all been planned and built at the same time (“Housing Developments”, 2011) These developments are usually areas of high density and low impact residences of single family homes. These housing developments are government run.
Other people who have houses in the area will not be happy to see the price of their houses decreasing, and if they bought their houses at the peak of property prices and the impact on house prices is very dramatic then these people could experience negative equity. House prices will be affected not only because of the increase in supply of houses but also due to the fact that having the ‘green belt land’ near to the area, means house prices would be higher, as the area is more desirable to potential house buyers with this land nearby, but with urbanisation of this land, then house prices will decrease. This land may be a big tourist attraction to the local area and in losing this land, money from the tourism may be lost, jobs may be lost and the local environment will be effected, not only on plants and animals but on people as well. If the land was a national park, then where the area may have received lots of money in tourism, this will be lost as people won’t be visiting the area if it is just houses, this would affect the local economy. Jobs in looking after the area will be lost, for example park wardens and people working in information centres & visitor shops will be put out of jobs and may struggle to find a new job, if they don’t have experience in building or labouring.
Is the use of flood plains inevitable in dealing with urban growth? Due to high demands for housing in certain areas, building on flood plains has become more common. A floodplain is part of a valley which floods regularly as a river bursts its banks. This has caused much disruption to many properties as flooding is becoming a regular occurrence in places such as Doncaster, Hull and Worcester. However the demand for affordable housing is still increasing, therefore building on floodplains is an obvious answer to this problem because they are cheap and have little agricultural value so the government are continuing to do so.
This battle improved the standard of living for Italians in two ways. The first of these is that it created jobs which allowed more working class Italians to earn an income to help provide for their families rather than live in poverty. The other was the improvement in the health of Italians living near the marshlands. This is due to the fact that the marshlands where full of disease, parasites and mosquitoes that spread malaria. By removing these marshes Mussolini helped eliminate malaria in Italy, drastically improving the standard of living in those areas.
At the beginning of the article, Coontz argued that what we miss about the 1950s is not the family structure, but the economic prosperity and an optimistic outlook for the future of the children. These were in fact created by the government, through the government subsidies for higher education, higher taxes on corporations, and corporations were forced to share extra earnings they made in this period with their employees, from janitors and secretaries to CEOs. Government assistance programs allowed families to remain stable and not fall back into poverty even if they were struck by bad
This agreement recognizes that adequate housing is a necessary facet of the right to an adequate standard of living. All governments have the responsibility to allocate funds for housing and institute policies, programs, and projects that contribute to quality of life for its citizens. When this need is underestimated and not provided based upon the specific needs of the population being served, the results are disastrous. This blight of society would lead one to think that the theater is only in developing countries, but there is a clear history that “advanced” nations allow the poorest individuals in society to suffer as the government shirks their obligation to provide adequate housing. England, the United States, and Hong Kong are among the richest nations in the world, but each have proven that money is not always an indication that the disabled, homeless, and otherwise socially disadvantaged populations will be protected.
I agreed with Bush’s ideas on housing. I think that the McKinney Act was a good idea. I believe that if we had attempted Dukakis’s plan, by just building more houses, it would not have helped the homeless. The homeless are homeless for a reason; they cannot afford to buy a brand new house. I believe that it was a