Analysis of Shakespeare's Sonnet 130

676 Words3 Pages
William Shakespeare is the most well-known poet of Great Britain and one of the most renowned literary figures in the world. He is famous for his outstanding plays, which have left a great trace in the course of literature and culture, and also for the invention of the new form of the verse – a sonnet. The main character of his sonnets and also the person to which these works are mainly devoted is the Dark Lady. The sonnet # 130 is a link in the chain of this kind of sonnets. The main idea of the sonnet is to express the feelings towards a woman describing her appearance in a poetic way. But here the reader can be misled by some kind of paradox: the thing is that the majority of poets tend to impute the supernatural beauty to their potential addressee if she or he is regarded as a beloved. But in this very work we do not observe anything unearthly described – quite a contrary, the lyrical hero gives a very down-to-earth description of his lover: he accepts that her beauty is not as vivid as the beauty of nature. Thus, from the first lines it is not even clear that the lyrical hero speaks about a beloved person and it is emphasized by such stylistic devices as a simple simile (“My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun”), disguised similes (“Coral is far more red than her lips’ red”, “If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun”, “If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head”, etc.), a metaphor (“I have seen roses damask’d, red and white, / But no such roses see I on her cheeks”). Moreover, the woman is called “mistress” by the lyrical hero, which can denote that this is just infatuation, but not love. However, at the end of the sonnet the lyrical hero removes all the doubts about the authenticity and strength of his feelings calling the woman “my love” and giving the final idea that no matter there is something better than his lover, no matter that he can

More about Analysis of Shakespeare's Sonnet 130

Open Document