In the case of “Jane Doe”, a kidney transplant patient, complete disclosure of risks about her procedure was not given. This failure to inform the patient led to her contracting not only hepatitis, but also HIV. The report claims, “Gift of Hope Organ & Tissue Donor Network in Elmhurst and the University of Chicago both knew the kidney donor was high-risk and did not inform the patient” (Vaughn 152). The physicians did not inform her of the risks of her new kidney transplant. Without this knowledge, Jane Doe gave what she believed was her informed consent for the surgery, which consequently violated her right to self-determination and did her extreme harm rather than good.
She uses these types of questions to try and force the reader agree with her; the more they think about, the more they will agree with the writer. For example in the third paragraph, Ms Aris asks the question “Is it not enough to have one tattoo (boring) but how many can we get?” The more we think about the question and the answer for it, we will naturally agree that the writer’s point is correct. In an effort to draw the reader’s attention to the article, Ms Aris becomes stereotypical towards teenagers. This is most evident in paragraph five: “teenagers think tattoos are beyond cool and start getting inked from a young age.” She assumes that teenagers become ‘inked’ because they think it would boost their social status. This technique can make parents think twice about letting their sons and daughters acquiring tattoos just so they can be ‘cool’.
To sum the essay up, Martin claims various motives a teen has to get a tattoo. He then talks about how there could be a significance of the tattoo to the teen’s life. Lastly, Martin proposes a tattoo is enduring to one who needs that. Today, people view tattoos more commonly in teenagers. Works Cited Martin, Andrés.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1974, which defined “sex” discrimination to include discrimination on the basis of pregnancy and child birth (Jennings, 2006). Because Paula is not pregnant, she has the right under the Equal Employment Opportunity and cannot can not be treated less equally which would be disparate treatment. Management should grant the transfer, make sure Paula is aware of the chemicals in case she does get pregnant and place Sam on probation excluding him from being around Paula. If his action occurs or he continually harasses Paula, Sam should lose his job to prevent the harassment from going to court. Newcorp would face the charges and pay Paula if she wins the case in
He is not only informally treating and collecting specimen from his daughter, but he is also not documenting any of the treatments that he is doing. This is a major problem and could be subject to intervention by the law. Joe is risking his medical credibility by doing this for his daughter. He is also performing these tests without the direct supervision of the supervising physician, which goes against the code of conduct (2013). If a physician assistant violates laws that vary from state to state, the physician assistant could be subject to license suspension or being
Health insurance is not a part of the religion therefore they must follow the Obama mandate. This would be another great point in that it is not their body, the body of the courts, their employers, nor the doctors to state what women should be doing with their body. Wikipedia states that the Justice Departments' job is to, “responsible for the enforcement of the law and administration of justice" which they tried to do in this case but Judge Kane ignored them. Roe V Wade decided that years ago that women have the right to have contraception and abortions up unto what is
I think teens should not be tried as adults because they have not experienced how does the adult world works long enough to realize what they are doing. They should however be sentenced to work for the community so they can know and analyze what were their crimes consequences. In addition to the lost brain matter all the prosecutors and specially the government is setting severe sentenced to young adults. We should not punish them because reasons are to why we call children kids. We can not call them adults when they are not tried as one.
Not too long ago tattooing did not experience the popularity it does today. Looking back at how people once perceived tattoos years ago and how they are becoming more and more common in today’s society shows how times are changing. It is obviously clear that tattoos have broken through their mysterious outlaw image; although to some, may be still viewed as rebellious behavior. Our culture has come a long way in what is seen as conservative and have exasperated many other ways of rebellion and more importantly ways of expressing themselves. Tattoos can now be worn proudly on the outside to show how one feels on the inside.
Alejandro Garcia Rhodes English 201 12 June 2009 Will the HPV vaccine save or kill lives Opponents and proponents of mandatory vaccinations have a huge dilemma. On one hand, Gardasil, a new Merck drug may prevent the human papilloma virus (HPV), from infecting millions of women worldwide. On the other hand, others are skeptical of administering the vaccine at all. Several bills have been introduced which would of informed parents about the HPV vaccine, and require them to vaccinate their daughters before entering middle school. The new Merck drug, Gardasil, should not be mandated by the federal government because it is a violation of parental rights and fast tracking a new vaccine could prove to be disastorous.
Rubin, Larry. Explicator 42 (1984): 57-59 Describes the story of a dream Connie had while lying in the sun. Rubin explains that Arnold Friend tells Connie all the things she wants to hear but does not in her real life. In the dream, Connie takes the credit for saving her family and feels pride for that. While I don’t feel this has anything to do with the story, it is an interesting idea and allows you to think outside the box.