Symbolism in Chekhovs The Seagull

1039 Words5 Pages
Symbolism in Chekhov’s “The Seagull” In Anton Chekhov’s “The Seagull,” he does not simply write about artists and love, he creates characters that are defined by art and love on stage. Through his characters' particular personalities, Chekhov portrays the various manners of being an artist and particularly, an artist in love. All four protagonists are artists in love. Arkadina, Trigorin, Treplev, and Nina have interlocking relationships with their craft and their lovers. Arkadina and Nina romanticize acting, with Arkadina placing herself on this pedestal, using her identity as an actress to excuse her vanity. Nina loves acting as well, but she endows acting with nobility. In writing, Treplev compulsively paralyzes himself in the pursuit of perfection, while Trigorin obsessively gathers details from his life and the lives around him for his work without allowing the work to affect his life. The existential thought of the purpose of life when death is certain puzzles a few characters in The Seagull. Masha first brings our attention to this theme in the beginning of Act One when she claims, "I am mourning for my life." She transfers the purpose of mourning for death to life. This point of view sets the tone for the play. Masha moans about her boredom and dissatisfaction with her life as she secretly hopes it will be turned around with the love of Treplev. If Treplev loved her, her life would suddenly have a purpose and meaning. Without the love of someone she loves in return, Masha views life as pointless and death-like. Later in the play, Masha changes her mind and marries Medvedenko out of boredom, not love. Her life still depresses her, and she still yearns for Treplev. But being a wife and a mother give her new things to do and think about to kill time until she dies. Sorin also wonders why he goes on living. Sorin sympathizes with Treplev
Open Document