Supersize Me Critique

2258 Words10 Pages
Supersize Me Critique Blank University of Pennsylvania Supersize Me Critique Title: Supersize Me Year: 2004 Production Company: Roadside Attractions & Samuel Goldwin Films Soundtrack Writers: Michael Parrish Lead Actors: Morgan Spurlock The purpose of this film is to demonstrate that the United States has approached epidemic obesity and its long-term effect on health due to unhealthy consumption of fast foods. Inspired by a lawsuit of two teenagers against the franchise McDonald’s, Morgan Spurlock embarks on an exaggerated experiment of a 30 day diet of exclusively McDonald’s. He ascertains that his experiment will cause him to gain weight and his health will deteriorate. The rules are simple: eat foods exclusively purchased at McDonald’s, super-size a meal each time asked, eat all three meals, and try everything on the menu at least once. Furthermore, he limits his physical activity to that of an average American. Spurlock conducts this self-experiment through a chronological, event-driven documentary spanning the month long journey making his appeal both by emotion and reason as he explores issues related to increased obesity rates in the United States, the target of children by large franchises, school lunch programs and the lobbying power of large food corporations. His documentary points the finger at fast food franchises, even demonizing them, but also raises the question of responsibility regarding the obesity epidemic. Does the responsibility lie within the corporate structure or is it personal? Serious in his attempt to educate that obesity is caused by consuming fast food, the film created a humorous atmosphere using visuals, sound and dialog. With a lackadaisical style, he assumes the role of an average citizen and persuades the audience to follow him through to his outcome. A video diary is used to express his feelings

More about Supersize Me Critique

Open Document