My reaction to this chapter is one that is mildly surprised. I found it interesting that “escape was easier than rebellion,” (Zinn 46). Apparently, the air was heavily charged with rumor of rebellion and revolt (something I think would work well for an espionage novel). I thought it was interesting how the white workers really put their heart and soul into getting a better life. This chapter made me start to see another side of the multifaceted history of the United States, one that wasn’t focused on equality for African Americans or women, but one that was focused on equality among common men.
Nike Research Paper Posted by admin as Example papers Research Paper: Hitting the wall – Nike and International Labor practice Introduction One should start by saying that having read the Nike company case study I understood that the company despite its great popularity in the USA has certainly been questioned for its notorious exploitory practices abroad. One one had the company strives to minimize its costs and maximize the profits, yet on the other hand some claim that it should do everything possible to benefit the society it works in. The following essay will explore the Nike’s global strategy towards cost minimization, explore the ethics behind it and present numerous educated findings together with my personal opinion. Body Outsourcing is one of the most important business practices that the modern day organizations use in their daily practices to minimize costs and improve competitive advantage. There currently are two main types of outsourcing: traditional and Greenfield 1.
Since that time, historians and scholars have tended to either regard Long and Coughlin as instigators of an irrational and anti-democratic uprising or as leaders and advocates of a great, forward moving social transformation. Brinkley contests both of these views quite persuasively. He maintains that Long and Coughlin had the ability to make clear the feelings of the American public that sought a means to defend the autonomy of the individual and to beat off the violations of the modern industrial state. The followers of Long and Coughlin, according to Brinkley, did not long for an economic collective, but rather for a return to a society where the individual had control over his own life and the power in society resided in institutions that were both visible and accessible from a local level. However, neither one of these leaders ever offered the American public logical plans for obtaining these goals.
John Hobson, an English economist, saw imperialism as inevitable, for powers of production outpace consumption resulting in more profit for the mother country (doc 2). The United States was involved in imperialism due to the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, which made the western hemisphere an American protectorate and their victory in the Spanish-American War making them a Pacific power. Both Europe and America believed imperialism could bring them economic power and capacity. Imperialism was not strictly confined to economics; it also included the political aims of unique states. John Hobson deemed demand for foreign markets for manufacturers and investments was responsible for the adoption of Imperialism as a political policy (doc 2).
By substituting images for claims, the pictorial commercial made emotional appeal, not tests of truth, the basis of consumer decisions.” (Pg. 127-128), Postman is showing that by only appealing to our base emotions, we aren’t required to think as much as when presented with fact. Because our culture has accepted this new attitude, Neil believes that our society has become worse. He uses the hyperbole as a sort of attention getter; to make a reader ask himself if the title can actually come true. Logos is used throughout the book and is mainly found in Postman’s quotes and examples.
American citizens pressured the government to regulate cooperations and trade in order to stop them from creating pools, make use of rebates, the monopolization of trade, and take advantage of the consumers which violated lassie faire ideas to a slight degree. Even though the regulations were small and did little to solve the problems presented by the people, it set the precedent for larger and stricter regulations to come into play in the future generations. American citizens also pressured the government to help preserve healthy competition in the business world but only to a minor degree. All of these actions changed the standards of what the government can do in the world of economics forever. Railroad expansion was relatively new during the gilded age.
Questioning authority can have a major effect on society, and can change it for the better. Although it is sometimes easier to just follow convention, the questioning of authority can have powerful repercussions, evident in the Declaration of independence, the Magna Carta and the Women’s Suffrage Movement. The Declaration of Independence shows that our founding fathers were frustrated with the English Monarchy, as the monarchy was unfairly taxing them and housing English troops against their will. The founding fathers could have just waited for the taxes to blow over, but they believed that if they questioned the authority of King George III, it would make the American society stronger and better. The Declaration of Independence showed that
October 2012 “Guarding the Golden Door” by Roger Daniels is an exquisite explanation of the American immigration system through history and in recent policies. Since 1882, the United States has claimed that their immigration goal was to prevent it from happening, while ironically enabling just the opposite. Consequently, the only true policy that has been applied to American immigration is that it is on a continuous loop of inconsistent policies, which are altered based on the current disposition of cheap labor for American industry demands. Most of the United States immigration policy has been created by individuals who failed to understand the effects of the plans they desperately tried to create, and who have created open door policies only to shut them. Perhaps one of the biggest flaws in the U.S. immigration policies over the past two centuries has been the fact that it is expensive to enforce immigration laws.
This generates commitments to objects instead of people, creating a more separate and powerful sense of self, which turns social relations into competitive interactions. Consumer culture has introduced disposability into the minds of consumers, which means more than throwing away produced goods, but also being able to throw away values, lifestyles, stable relationships, and attachments to things, buildings, people and received ways of being and doing (Harvey, 1990,285). American consumer culture came into being after WW1, when successful American corporations faced the threat of overproduction. Corporations needed to make sure consumers would buy their products and found ways to turn luxury products into functional products. Through advertising, product placement, celebrity endorsement and even social movements, corporations found ways to convince consumers to want things they didn’t need.
Naturalization The question is no longer, “How do people become Americans?” but rather “How has America become its people?” Since the days of the colonies, the United States was viewed as the land of opportunity, a globalized estate that was a safe heaven from political tyranny, social prosecution, and economical struggles. As the United States matured however the tolerance of immigrants quickly fell, leaving the White Anglo Saxon Protestant to be the desired people of the land. The image of the country of immigrants that was the building block of the constitution all but excelled. This paper will seek to highlight race-biased legislation as well as feature critical trials in the struggle for equal rights among Asian Americans. From the 1840s