Stakeholders and Shareholders Theories

330 Words2 Pages
There were 2 argumentative theories regarding value creation and maximization, one is shareholder theory, one is stakeholder theory. Shareholder theory follows Friedman, stated that shareholders interest in the increase in value of their shares is paramount of corporations’ goals, there is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits. The conception started from an assumption that the social purpose of corporation is to maximise shareholders’ wealth, this is one way for a corporation to generate goodwill as a by-product of expenditures that are entirely justified on its own self-interest . To explain for this statement, considered this conception implies that Company’s Directors and Executives act as agents of the shareholders, and should use Corporation’s resources only for their principal’s benefit. This conception shows that the objective of corporation should be maximise the share value of the corporation, with the superior interest to shareholders. Stakeholder theory claims that corporation should be guided by concern the interest not only of shareholders, but of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, local community, besides shareholders; whose interests are affected by company’s performance. Stakeholder theory, argues that managers should made decisions so as to take account of the interests of all stakeholders in a firm. The goal of corporate governance is to maximise the wealth creation of the corporation as a whole. A stakeholder was defined by Freeman as any group or individual who can affected by the achievement of the firm’s objectives, and this is meant to generalise the notion of stockholder as the only group to whom management need to be responsive. These two theories attempt to define what main objective of corporation value

More about Stakeholders and Shareholders Theories

Open Document