Shooting an Elephant “Shooting an Elephant” is an essay written by George Orwell, published in 1936. Orwell was a journalist, well known for Animal Farm and 1984 (66). In the essay, Orwell tells his experience with an enraged bull elephant while on duty as a police officer in British Burma. The main focus of Orwell’s essay is about his encounter with the “must” elephant (67). He describes the destruction that the elephant caused, including the death of a villager (68).
Tarantino shows her driving in this scene to show that she still has not completed her journey. She first explains what Bill and the Deadly Viper Assassins have done to her (by this time in the movie we know that she once was part of the Deadly Viper Assassins). She then tells how they annihilated her wedding rehearsal with intent to slaughter her and everyone there, and they almost did just that. The last bullet was saved for Bill to end the life of the pregnant bride, “Arlene,” but it did not kill her, but put her into a coma. In a hospital, four years later, Beatrix was bitten by a mosquito and awoke from the coma.
The prisoner’s travel and Sergei claims Katarina has ruined his life and takes up with another women. They are making their way along a fast paced river and Katerina attacks the other women falling into the river disappearing into the current. This would become the denunciation of shosticovitches work until he wrote his fifth symphony simplifying his techniques and adapting classical models. It was a portrayal of primitively realistic sexual content and lucid descriptive music in the sex scenes “Pornophony” . Shostokovich felt it was a justification of Genocide during an oppressive rule of Stalin.
This has a strong impact on Orwell when a working elephant escapes from its owners’ home and begins to terrorize a local village, killing a man. The owner of the elephant, and the only one who can control it, is looking for the elephant but in the wrong direction, and is about twelve hours away. When the elephant is located grazing in a nearby field, Orwell has to decide whether or not to shoot the elephant or wait for the owner’s return. The added pressure of the locals behind Orwell, some of whom want the meat from the elephant and others just hopeful to see a European being crushed to death by the elephant, make it much more difficult for him to reach a decision. In the end Orwell reluctantly decides to shoot the elephant “solely to avoid looking a fool” (479) in front of the Burmese people.
Shooting an Elephant Summary ‘‘Shooting an Elephant’’ begins with a meditative prelude to the action in which the narrator, who may be presumed to be Orwell, comments on being a colonial policeman in British Burma in the middle of the twentieth century. ‘‘I was hated by large numbers of people,’’ he says, and ‘‘anti-European feeling was very bitter.’’ A European woman crossing the market would likely be spat upon and a subdivisional police officer made an even more inviting target. Once, at a soccer match, a Burmese player deliberately fouled the narrator while the Burmese umpire conveniently looked the other direction and the largely Burmese crowd ‘‘yelled with hideous laughter.’’ The narrator understands such hatred and even thinks it justified, but he also confesses that his ‘‘greatest joy’’ at the time would have been to bayonet one of his tormenters. The action of ‘‘Shooting an Elephant’’ begins when the narrator receives a telephone report of an elephant ‘‘ravaging the bazaar.’’ He takes his inadequate hunting rifle and rides on horseback to the area where the animal allegedly lurks. The narrator remarks on the squalor and poverty of the neighborhood, with its palm-leaf thatch on the huts and unplanned scattering of houses over a hillside.
It was also about that time that Steve Martin wrote and performed the famous song about King Tut. Everyone I knew was doing the Egyptian dance and Egyptian jewelry was all the rage. As attention-grabbing as this story was, people soon began debating whether the mummy curses were fact or fiction. Certain scientists and archeologists believed it was true due to the alleged writings on the entrance to his tomb which stated, “Death Shall Come on Swift Wings to Him Who Disturbs the Peace of the King.”(The Museum of UnNatural History, n.d., ¶ 1). After the opening of the tomb in the early 1920’s, rumors spread that animals and people connected with the tomb opening were dying of unusual circumstances.
She was in a hospital until one day four years later; Beatrix was awoken by the bite of a mosquito. She awoke no longer a normal person; she possessed internal powers of the super natural Beatrix tells that she hasn’t accomplished her goal quite yet and makes that loud and clear. She is very firm as she explains that she has gone on a “roaring rampage of revenge." Beatrix does not just tell the viewers that she has gotten satisfaction from killing so many people,
People have also killed many cheetahs for their beautiful fur. In the early 1970's, the fur trade became a big threat to cheetahs. According to The Grolier Student Encyclopedia, the United States Endangered Species Act of 1973 and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of 1975 gave the cheetah protected status and reduced the trade in cheetah fur. Cheetahs are still shot by African farmers and ranchers who see the cats as a threat to their livestock. In Big Cats, Cheetahs, Ned Halman explains that cheetahs need a wide open space to live in.
WHY I AM FOR FILM VIOLENCE Many films employ violence as a way to entertain their audiences. Quentin Tarantino's spagetthi western action masterpiece, Kill Bill, is one of them. The film stars Uma Thurman as Beatrix Kiddo or the Bride, an assassin who abandons her squad known as the Deadly Vipers after finding out she is pregnant. The squad in question finds Beatrix at a wedding party and slaughters her friends and family. Bill is the leader of this gang and Beatrix's ex-lover who also participates in the killings.
Several years ago, the Woburn Safari Park in Bedfordshire, England admitted to killing excess monkeys. The park said that it cost too much to continue to feed the monkeys, so the animals were shot and left to die. This is just one of the many cases in which animals are mistreated, murdered, and malnourished by humans. Animals should be able to live life in natural environments without any negative influences by humans. The first reason zoos should be banned is because of the fact that malnutrition, mistreatment, and murder (the three m's) is becoming more and more popular in zoos worldwide.