Parents may have difficulties with the language and therefore cannot help their children. Furthermore, parents can find that they do not have enough knowledge of their children's subjects. Some students on the other hand get a lot of help and a nice experience of homework. This is not equal and therefore a reason not to have homework. On the other hand, the opposing side usually argue that there are good reasons to insist on regular homework for school pupils.
If this is the case the teacher can tell if gifted children are helping their fellow classmates with the homework or work that is being taught. Gifted children normally need more of a challenge in school than other children. Parents who have a gifted child will want them to not be in a room where they aren’t challenged enough because then the child isn't learning anything. If a child isn't learning anything they will get bored easier and then they won’t want to go to school. In schools, there are more children who need more help than gifted children.
Children with a lack of cultural capital are more likely to use the restricted code (limited vocabulary) which disadvantages them at school as they feel excluded and are therefore less successful. Working-class children typically use the restricted code. Bourdieu argues that cultural capital affects academic achievement as it ties in with educational capital. Middle-class children with cultural capital are better equipped to meet the demands of the school curriculum.
If a W.C student is labelled by a middle-class (M.C) teacher the student often believe that the teacher is right therefore they take that label they have been given and they become a self-fulfilling prophecy which means they accept the label they have been given and stay that standard, this is basically saying if a student is labelled negatively they stay negative because they are ‘fulfilling their own prophecy’ so they are now going to underachieve in education. This is effected by poverty due to W.C generally not being able to afford nice uniforms so the teacher can tell they come from a W.C background because they don’t look as smart as the M.C students. Another reason in the claim that poverty is the main reason for W.C underachievement is because they are generally more fatalistic. If a W.C child is fatalistic in school then it means that they are also culturally deprived, because they are culturally deprived they have attitudes which insist that they are not going to do well in school because for example their parents didn’t then they will not try to get an education as they are fatalistic about being setup to fail in
Assessment 3 Practising successful inclusion Gerald Pg, 364 Gerald has been identified as having Asperger’s Syndrome. Attwood (2007) states, students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have difficulty with theory of the mind which is a core cognitive deficit. Gerald lacks social skills and struggles to develop cooperative social interactions which contributes to poor peer relationships. This behaviour leaves Gerald excluded from friendships and social situations. This makes school unenjoyable for the student which can lead to outbursts of anger and fights with other students.
This allows students to feel more secure about themselves and the way they feel. A corrupted or an unhealthy family can impact a student very negatively. The student’s parents might be divorced or the parents simply don’t have time to spend time with their child. An unhealthy parental relationship may lead to extreme situations such as divorce and that would inflict unneeded pain toward the student. They may not be able to cope with it and stop doing homework, and earn bad grades not because they are inept, but they do not have any support.
It is because this may not only lead to a damaged relationship between teachers and students, but also can lead to negative associations. Consequently, positive punishment cannot be used frequently. Apart from the above method, there is another way to chastise the students which is negative punishment. Negative punishment is the removal of a favorable stimulus after an unwelcome performance in order to decreases that response, which means if students did something wrong and their favorable things such as toys or smart phones will be taken away as a punishment. Jason, one of my students, as an example, he loves playing PSP and NDS very much, so before
Over time, kids will have lower academic scores. A slew amount of kids is by nature motivates to learn. Schools should not pay students for good grades because it leads to practical problems to have lower academic scores over time, to show that countless children are self-motivated to learn. First of all, students should not be paid for good grades, since it results in multiple practical problems. The practical problems can be a conflict with parents.
Gender Research Paper Although many may feel that gender segregated schools are a more efficient way to teach boys and girls due to the fact that they’ll be able to concentrate better and learn more proficiently, it’s actually quite the opposite. While doing much research, the facts, data and personal stories from those who have experienced gender segregated schools, it has become apparent that separating boys and girls from learning together it far from helpful and rather hurtful in the long run. Gender segregated schools are negative for both boys and girls due to the fact that gender stereotypes are being reinforced, communication and opportunities for boys and girls to work together are diminished before entering the real world and future relationships between the two genders are also being ruined little by little. Many schools, public and private, are switching from co-ed learning environments to single-sex learning environments due to faulty theories that have existed for more than 20 years. Such theories include that “boys need a competitive and confrontational learning environment, while girls can only succeed if they work cooperatively and are not placed under stress” (Sherwin).
Some academics come naturally to students and if they are outnumbered by those that don’t comprehend the lesson, then they may receive a poor grade. In the same manner if a student is outnumbered by intellectual student then they would receive a grade they did not earn. I have seen a few children in the classroom who can read really well and it would not be fair to those few students if they received a low grade because the majority of the class does not know how to read well yet. Another downside to group grading is that sometimes you find that some people work harder than others. In college as well as in kindergarten you find students that put forth no effort, when this happens you have students who are going to have to work harder to pick up the slack.