Social Contract Theory Reaction Paper

1245 Words5 Pages
As a Social Scientist, how can the Social Contract Theory answer the criticism that we are incapable to care about our own welfare? In the beginning of our lives, we grow up within an existing society. It means that we merely don’t have a choice of entering into a social contract. This is like when you’re forced to sign a contract that you have not read before or you don’t have any idea about it at all. Critics say that when you have no choice in entering such contracts, it will be void. By describing how the social contract comes in an individual, its proponents (John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau) answer these critics. First, they said that everyone begins with a special kind of contract called a filial contract which exists between the members of a family. It is established at the moment of bonding between parents and child following birth, and the terms of the contract are the mutual relationships between the parents and the children – to give satisfaction and to receive love, support, guidance, and protection. Second, when the parents join a society, they come to pool their rights and duties as parents with the other members of the society. This means that they will only be agents of the larger society in raising their own children. Third, it happens whenever the child encounters other members of the larger society. They will live together in harmony and not fight with each other using any available means; they are establishing a social contract among themselves. This social contract is called transitive. Fourth, as a person makes transitions, his obligations change to match his abilities, and the filial contract gives way to the larger social contract and obligations to larger communities at the local, provincial, national, and global levels. Lastly, the social contracts of several societies may not extend to one another but are in a state of
Open Document