Snc-Lavalin's Gadhafi Disaster

518 Words3 Pages
According to SNC-Lavalin's Gadhafi disaster: The inside story, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. has committed to ethical behaviour and good corporate governance as it awaits the outcome of investigations involving former employees, including its previous chief executive officer. With regard to the school of ethical universalism, the same standards of what's ethical and what's unethical resonate with peoples of most societies regardless of local traditions and cultural norms; hence, common ethical standards can be used to judge the conduct of personnel at companies operating in a variety of country markets and cultural circumstances. Ben Aissa had negotiated an unusual deal with his old bosses at Lavalin: he, with at least one of his new wife's relatives, would together earn a 2% commission on any SNC contracts in Saudi Arabia, regardless of whether they performed any work, and this arrangement is considered unethical and conflicted. This constitutes unethical business behaviour regardless of the country or culture in which a company’s personnel are conducting activities. In terms of school of ethical relativism, different societal cultures and customs have divergent values and standards of right and wrong and thus, what is ethical or unethical must be judged in the light of local customs and social mores and can vary from culture or nation to another. From the study, forensic auditors enlisted by SNC's board say Ben Aissa doled out $56 million to shadowy foreign agents in an effort to land business, and this puts the company in the sights of a federal law that prohibits Canadian businesses from paying bribes abroad. This explores that in many countries it is customary to pay bribes to government officials in order to win a government contract, obtain a license or permit, or facilitate an administrative ruling, it is also normal to make payments to prospective customers in

More about Snc-Lavalin's Gadhafi Disaster

Open Document