Therefore, he won’t do that in his writing because it may decrease the reader’s attention. Second of all, he concluded that he wasn’t appreciated the end of the book. He said, “The plot developments were outlandish”. According to that, it expressed him to avoid ending the story like that. Furthermore, there is the encouragement for him to write a better book: “I can do better that this.
His narratee almost becomes a projection of himself and his own values and the real reader very quickly sees through the fact that Stevens cannot see outside his own prejudices and social sphere. Stevens devotes many pages of his narrative (1990:31-35; 113-116) expounding the criteria of The Hayes Society and its regulation of standards among butlers, for this is the standard by which he himself adheres to and by which, he assumes, his readers will discern. As his prejudices are well to the forefront of the novel, the sceptical
Also, restate the wording of the first reason so it doesn’t simply copy the reason as you stated it in the complete thesis. Example: “The first reason to avoid Kevin Smith’s movies is the low-brow humor.” • Support for Reason One: Textual support, quotations, examples, expert authorities, cases, statistics, comparisons to similar subjects, analogies (comparisons to somewhat related subjects). • Address objection, and refute. Arguments are always strengthened when the writer addresses opposing reasons to
Ingeniously, the journey that the reader experiences begins and ends at the same spot - Miller's acceptance of the world. In the first part Orwell focuses on a curiosity of Miller's book. He tries to uncover whether a publication that refuses to take a political stand in a world moving rapidly towards World War II, can actually be a “good” book. After comparing it with several other authors with similar style (e.g. Whitman, Joyce), Orwell finds its main quality in the way it focuses on an ordinary human being.
The two writers I included in this paper Andrew Ofstad and Ursula Le Guin have similar and different ideas on how technology can affect literature, but also if reading maybe declining in society. I don't focus so much on if reading is declining; I focus if technology is really detrimental to reading and learning to society. I think it is important to see that reading is important for learning, but technology also has a way for people to read and learn as well. I don't expect you as the reader to agree with my own conclusion, but to decide on your own opinion on the matter after reading my essay. Andrew Ofstad's "America's Decline in Literacy Reading: Grappling with Technology's Effects on the Print of Culture" and Ursula Le Guin's "Staying Awake: Notes on the Alleged Decline of Reading" are both essays that focus on the decline of reading in society.
Fowles is constantly trying to highlight the differences between art and reality in order to give his characters independence. Up to Chapter 13’s digression, Fowles’s readers have been allowed to consider that they have been reading a conventional Victorian novel to a certain extent. However, Fowles’s repetition of ‘perhaps’ encourages his readers to view the text in a more fictional way. When Fowles teases the audience by saying; ‘perhaps I live now in one of the houses I have brought into the fiction’ – he humorously says that his fictional characters are ‘perhaps’ an ‘illusion’ therefore stating that the whole novel is an illusion. From the outset we already know that their author controls Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as Shakespeare already writes out their destiny for them.
Another is that it was a warning, saying that if things continue the way in which they were going, the future could end up bearing some resemblance to what he wrote. Another interpretation is that his book was not a prediction at all; it was purely a fiction book. I do think that it is difficult to ‘talk into a black hole.’ I think that authors are writing and writing and not enough people are reading their books and those who are perhaps are not reading deeply enough or not seeing what the author intended for the reader to see. I do not think, though, that this is a problem. I think that books are open to the reader’s interpretation and once the book has been published, the author relinquishes the sole right to own the book’s meaning because it means different things for different
The ending of the novel is an unsatisfactory conclusion for the reader. Discuss. The true purpose of Mohsin Hamid’s 2007 novel, The Reluctant Fundamentalist, is difficult to ascertain. It is this difficulty though that makes it a satisfying narrative even for those expecting a traditional conclusion which does not eventuate. By using a framed narrative, Hamid consciously leaves the reader with an open ending, as a traditional conclusion would neither have been as appropriate or as successful.
The purpose of chapter one, Fitzgerald introduces the reader the key theme of the novel, which will become prevalent throughout: the division between gender and social class. Furthermore, Fitzgerald introduces us to the major characters through Nick’s narration and perception. The first character we are introduced to is Nick Carraway, the narrator. The reader immediately knows that they are reading from his observation and perspective and so the novel is written through Nick’s memory. Fitzgerald aims to build a sense of trust and so portrays characters as well educated and enlightened, as such that Nick is ‘inclined to reserve all judgments’ and being ‘privy to the secret grief of wild, unknown men’.
Before we properly begin, it might be prudent to demolish the possibility of literary laziness or carelessness birthing these loose ends. Any reader of Shaw’s other works will undoubtedly acknowledge him as anything but a lazy writer - great thought and research has evidently gone into his other works and it logically follows this play warrants equal investment. Furthermore, a cursory examination of the text itself indicates high audience awareness evident in the self-censorship Shaw employs in his language. In constructing Mrs Warren’s Profession, he alludes to and hints at Kitty Warren’s profession but never