Different types of schools help as parents have more choice and freedom of where they want their child to go. Single sex schools also help as it is thought that females do well when there are no males to distract them. They also get better exam results. Academy
Department of Education that show that girls outshine boys in reading, writing, science, math, and have a lot higher educational aspirations. She also gives us data that shows that girls are starting to beat boys in enrolling in college, and that girls are more engaged in academically then boys. She implies that all of this has been happening because the educational doesn’t “favor” boys over girls anymore. I agree with that statement, but I also don’t think that the educational should let boys be “left behind” either. Yes, boys are bad at school; I can say this because I’m a boy and I see everything first hand, my peers are less and less interested in school and college, they often talk about just either dropping out of high school and getting a job, graduating and just work and not go to college or simply join the military.
Cultural deprivation theorists would blame this on the lack of parental guidence and encouragment to succeed in education. This could of been developed from the results of an experiment A famous experiment was one carried out by Willis Douglas. He claimed that parental interest was the most important factor; he claimed that middle class parents had higher expectations than working class parents and they attatched higher values. Along with providing more support for their children. This was seen to increase
This bought on Marketisation where schools try to attract other students by raising standards to show they are most successful. On the other hand, sociologists disagree as most educational reforms have not helped all students, only some or wasn’t very effective enough to help improve educational experiences. For example, the Foster Act wasn’t very helpful as the teaching was dire and students were less successful therefore resulted them in having weak qualifications and bad experiences. The Butler Act system with the 11+ exam was mostly based on middle class children therefore they had a better chance than working class. This was unequal as they had an advantage even though the test was the same.
There are some major problems with using them. Students with high I.Q’s are expected to do better than the rest of their class, and on the flip side students with low I.Q.’s are expected to do worse. That is not always fair because students with low I.Q.’s might not get the attention needed simply because their teachers do not expect much from them. In the end there is no fairness to some. This leads to an ethical question of, is giving an intelligence test ethical?
This meant that the teachers focused on all the students not just the able students. However, it did have a negative effect, teachers sometimes cheated to get better grades so that they got a wage increase. This also caused schools to adapt to exams and inspections. Which then led on to introducing revision which is a massive part of education nowadays. The revised code also showed tax payers that their money wasn't being wasted and the government was using it
Nowadays, most of the schools are providing rewards to students hoping that they will get better results, and most of the schools have succeeded. For example, in Chicago, school paid for grades, and students got better grades and attended class more. In Dallas, paying kids for reading books made them better reader even after stopping reward. As well in Washington, they paid for attendance and behavior, and students got better on standardized reading tests. This way, researchers have found that the result of reward programs will be better for kids, especially for those kids who are struggling the most.
It would also be reasonable to suspect that the effect of coaching might be higher for certain types of students- for example, students who scored lower on the PSAT, students who don’t receive private tutoring, and so forth. Results of another study suggest that coaching on the math section of the SAT is most effective for students with strong socioeconomic backgrounds, students who perform well in their high school math courses, and students who are actively involved in extracurricular activities. (Briggs). Research by the College Board, which also administers the SAT to more than 1.5 million students a year, found that students can
Also, they will not ask themselves are they really doing better. It is a fact that most of the charter schools have the same or lower standardized test scores as public schools. Many people do not think independently and look at how the schools are set up differently and if that has an impact on students. The audience’s perspective is not likely to be narrow because education is important to most people whether they have children or not. Many people do not look past the surface of what is going on with things like charging disciplinary fees and whether or not they are necessary.
This therefore means that since their distraction and hyperactivity levels are suppressed, they can function well and execute tasks as well as the average non-ADHD student. However, when non-ADHD students pervade the system, the state of equality is compromised. This provides non-ADHD Adderall consumers a continued advantage over the ADHD students. These essentially still have a better shot at thriving better and outperforming the ADHD. This deliberate use of Adderall to gain better grades puts ADHD students at a further disadvantage because there is no other means by which the field could be leveled once more.