Ancient civilizations of the Roman empire (500-27 BC), Han dynasty of China (206-220 CE) and Gupta empire in India (320-550 CE) all share similarities and differences in political and social organization. From the republic of Rome during the control of Octavian and Augustus to the establishment of caste membership in the Guptan empire. Also, the organization of a strong centralized government during Han dynasty. Other than political concern, these civilizations shared common characteristics of social organization. For example, a system of social hierarchy and a society based on patriarchal.
Octavian then became the Roman Empire’s leader and brought them into a peace. There is a lot of comparison and difference between the Persian and Roman Empire. They each reached great means when it came to running their empire. They established a government and conquered many territories and places. However, there are also a lot of difference between the two empires.
Holland’s book’s key point is the conflict between Sulla and Marius. These men were Roman politicians with very different backgrounds and personalities. Each was the seeking the same political goal, so they competed to the point of war. At first they manipulated the people, then they tried to find loop holes in the political system. And finally they started a civil war in which Sulla came out on top.
By 476 CE, the Roman government was a complete dictatorship. The seats of the Senate were controlled by the Emperor. So, the Senate’s role drastically changed. The Emperors would place their friends and family on the Senate over people who actually had experience. The Senate in Rome was obviously continuity, but the government had its fair share of changes.
Qin China and Imperial Rome In this essay I am going to be comparing the methods of political control between Qin China and Imperial Rome. With China being located in the west and Rome being in the east, these two empires did have some differences and similarities between in each other. According to, (Hansen, pg#126) both China and Rome conquered expansive territories that soon made them the two leading empires of the world. The Chinese governance was more centralized and bureaucratic than then Romans. That meant that they had a more professional administration.
Senators and Generals: Important to the Roman Republic and leaders of the fall. The senators and generals were an important part of the Roman Republic government structure, but unfortunately they were also just as important in the destruction of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was a large and strong government structure. A governmental structure that dictated laws, regulations and policies to the people of Rome. The government expanded greatly along with acquisition and control of the area of land that was acquired through battles.
And the only aristocrats who stood up for change were assassinated by corrupt senators. The ex small farmers were absolutely furious. Not only was the government corrupt, but the roman army was weakening. The large population of landless roman citizens could
POLITICS Chinese empire: ChineseIn China, political structure was led by the emperor, his officials, commoners and the slaves. Also, many philosophers influenced the structure with their ideas. For example, Confucius stated that there must be respect between the classes; legalist idea emphasized on development of the state, collective responsibility and punishment. On the other hand, the emperors had absolute power with a set of advisors. They could distribute land, build massive projects or execute by their will.RomanThe political structure in the roman empire varied from the time period.
Both of these systems were practiced over many years preceding their writings. The purpose of their writings was to explain why those forms of government are legitimate. Both theories begin with the same basic assumptions, however their conclusions differ greatly. Their opinions were heavily influenced by the general felling of people towards the government of that time. The foundation of both of these theories is identical.
Beard supports his thesis by giving evidence of the economic interests of elite who wrote the Constitution, and then showing how the structure of the government benefits these specific interests. d. Commager iv. Commager supports his thesis by naming the two problems that the Constitution worked to fix, the problem of federalism and how to use laws to keep power of different branches of government in check. III. Types of evidence used e. Beard v. Newspapers and pamphlets from the time period (The Federalist) vi.