Should Whistleblowers Be Protected?

890 Words4 Pages
Should Whistleblowers be protected? Whistleblowers and their acts have been a hot topic all around the world lately. From Julian Assange to Edward Snowden to Bradley Manning, These men have risked everything they have to stand up for what they believe is right. The definition of a whistleblower is someone at work who has access to inside information and sees it as serious misconduct and reports it via the press or another organisation like Wikileaks. If the whistleblower reports it in the right circumstances, they should be protected by whistleblower law. Some laws even reward whistleblowers for their feats. For example, whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld disclosed information to the IRS and this led to a massive fraud investigation. Despite nearly spending 40 months in jail for conspiracy charges, the IRS paid Birkenfeld $104 million for acting as a corporate whistleblower. It is important for any whistleblower to understand the law before you take the risks. Some whistleblower laws have been altered in the past. The Whistleblower Protection Act was altered in 1978. It now excludes intelligence agencies such as the CIA and the NSA. It seems crazy to me that certain whistleblowers are not fully protected. The majority of people leaking classified information to the public, is that they can make a difference to the country they live in and indeed the world. For instance, the number one source for fraud detection in America is by whistleblowers. In my eyes, they are an invaluable part of our world. We need people to break out of things that they feel are unjust and show them to the world. Edward Snowden is a perfect example of a man that done exactly that. Snowden is a former CIA and NSA employee who leaked several top secret United States and British government mass surveillance programs to the Guardian newspaper. He currently resides in Russia after the U.S
Open Document