Living Wage Law Poverty has increased because the wealth has been only flowing one direction. Living-wage laws must be passed in order to make salaries fair for the working poor. Although passing these laws could be a solution, there is a lot of controversy surrounding this issue. According to Maude Hurd, living-wage laws benefit workers because they provide higher wages that enable them to supply their primary needs. Additionally, living-wage laws allow workers more time to spend with their families.
Twenge says, “There’s this idea that, ‘Yeah, I don’t want to work, but I’m still going to get all the stuff I want” (Peck 303). Some young adults have not even left their home before. They enjoy staying at home and not realizing that they should go out to find jobs. The main reason why young adults do not want to work is that their parents still guide them like children. Today, millions young adults are facing real problems: lack of job opportunities, housing, and trying to survive in a fast, globalized world.
A church I attended during my youth started a program entitled “Backpacks for Kids” in which members would meet one night a week to pack nutritious snacks into a backpack that were then issued to kids who were known to go home daily to an empty house. There would be enough healthy food in the pack to last the entire week. The recipients were particularly “at risk” children whose names were submitted from teachers within the local schools. These children had shown signs of malnutrition and weight loss, red flags for the teachers that the child was not able to have accessible food at home, for whatever reason. Some also even had bad dental decay, all of which are signs of indulging in excessive sweets while unsupervised at home.
All children can now receive state education up until the age of 18, meaning they are better educated and can achieve much higher in adulthood, whilst experiencing a longer period of youth. All of these changes have improved the experience of childhood and cause Functionalists to believe that things are getting better. However, Marxist and Feminist sociologists disagree, claiming that the march of progress view is too positive. They believe that a child’s experience of childhood depends on their class, ethnicity and gender, and that Functionalists overlook the inequalities between these factors. This is called the ‘conflict’ view.
To be a perfect parent to your kids is have a good back ground. If the kid father/mother is a criminal and/or is at jail, when the kid (kids) goes to school they get bullies saying “Oh that kid`s father/mother is at jail he must be stupid” Basically the kid will have a hard time at school and not having friends. Additionally because the kid had a bad life, he will become like his father/mother. This true because it happens to most kids whose parents have bad reputation. This also works on the kids name when the parents give it to them.
O'Roark provides more detail, saying that to few children can hurt the economy of the family, while to many can drain it . Clearly he recognizes children's economic advantage. This economic contribution of children was also very valued in the Classical period . Shaw points out the other valuable role of the child was to care for the parents in old age. This is the idea that children would be the ones who helped aging parents, and eventually buried them .
The percentage of high school drop outs in United States is very high, and some these students that drop out end up in prison or other terrible places such as drug dealing or gangs. In the documentary they also showed some schools with a lot of gang activity and gang violence. Parents of these students work very hard to pay taxes and keep there children in school, in hop that there children will get a good education. Some parents take tons of loans so they can send there kids to a private school, because the public schools are not teaching there students well. These hard working parents and dedicated teachers all want to see America with a brighter future, they are doing what they can to make sure that there children grow up to be important part of a good generation.
[1] Different people from different countries look up to America not just the country of freedom but also the “land of oppurtunity”. Compared to other countries Americans work more hours per week; however, I wish we can also the say the same when it comes to our children's education. How can we still say that our children is our future when they are not even being motivated the right way when it comes to their education? To begin with, library loss has had a big effect on our children's education. Shutting down libraries may help bring some funds back to our countries but in return children are losing their freedom of reading.
It is not that they demand too much from their kids but they expect too little. Parents try so hard to provide their children’s needs to make them happy and become their kid’s best friend that they forget about being a real parent. A parent who knows what is best for their child should not be afraid to say “no”, “The mistake that many parents make today is not that they’re too strict but rather too lenient”. They should discipline and set limits to consumption and teach their children the value of a
Building a stronger economy means being able to have the millions that are here continue their education and this would have positive impact on the economy. These students, who normally are unable to obtain financial aid, would be aiding state schools. By giving that back, the schools too will see the positive fiscal impact. Not only that, but the schools would have a larger percentage of students going into these professional jobs and closing the gap that we have in the labor