It is cruel to keep animals in cages! It IS cruel to keep animals in cages. It is an unhygienic and unhealthy way to live, the animal loses its natural instincts and the animal has rights too. It is cruel to keep animals in cages because it is unhygienic and unhealthy to live in a cage. Animals need exercise, as every living thing does.
How is it that humans can test on animals, while the animals feel everything that humans feel? It shouldn’t be okay to test on animals because they have the same pain tolerance as humans do. The testing on animals is dangerous and it is harming the animals; it is cruel to the animals by keeping the animals locked up in cages, humans use the animals for testing the products that the humans use for the use of humans only, and it is unfair to the animals by keeping them in the lab and not letting the animals run around. Humans shouldn’t be able to test on animals. The humans that say testing on animals helps the United States with the problems that are going on and make sure the product is safe to use so it can be tested on animals to see if it will harm the humans before the use.
You can state that it is an opinion matter but there are such factsthat prove either way. “Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should,therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined areacompared with their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are farless successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to manydiseases and other dangers.” ("Zoos Should be Banned.”) “No matterhow big some zoos try to make the enclosures, no matter how many branches theyput in them, no matter how beautiful they make the background paintings on thewall, they don't compare with the natural habitat the animals were meant to bein.
Founding members of Showing Animals Respect and Kindness (SHARK) and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) are groups of people that do not understand the origin of rodeo and its sensitivity to animal welfare issues. When something is not understood, it is commonly misconstrued. Rodeo is being protested against because the people of PETA and SHARK play on readers emotions. Emotions, especially “blind” ones, are strong enough to cause people to take action against organizations or activities about which they have no background information. If more people did not rely so much on emotions and relied more on intelligence, then problems like this would not arise.
I found the story very difficult to support, mainly because of the way he stereotyped animal rights. He uses pathos to explain his view point of the issue and a lot of logical fallacies along the way. Such slippery slope when he says “we must leave animals free - to overrun and destroy our property, to eat our food, even to kill our children” and he uses pathos when he stated that he is a pure man-hatred that has no limited to a few leader in notion of animal “rights”. Throughout this story, the writer gives wrong evidence. He tries to prove how animal testing affects animals, but the evidence that he gives us was some kind of violence and lacking police protection.
In most cases, this imprisonment causes irreversible damage to animals, resulting in them not being suitable to be re-introduced to their natural environment, because they don’t know how to survive there. It is something that man can’t teach them either. Zoos are presented to children as educational, a place where you can see the animals and learn more about them. It is in fact only a lesson in cruelty and hypocrisy, because there is nothing educational in making these kids think it is normal and amusing to see these animals in an artificial environment. Kids will learn a lot more about animals watching Animal Planet, where the animals are filmed in their natural habitat, and where they are born
I shouldn't do ****. I don't care about them they all could die and it won't affect my life. I know a lot about them but I don't need to think about them. They're just a waste of time koalas are stupid they don't help me with **** so why should I help them. If they all die there will be more room for the panthers and all the other hard animals.
Holding animals in captivity hurts them in many ways. They are deprived of their freedom because they cannot experience the normal existence of other animals in the wild. Animals should not be held in captivity because of the social, psychological, and environmental effects that it has on them, this can be changed by using the funding for zoos, aquariums, and other captivity environments to make more wildlife reserves where the animals can live wild and free. Holding animals in captivity is just plain out wrong. The captivation of animals has been done for years and along with this captivity has come many horror stories of attacks on humans which resulted in deaths.
There are many different debates about banning animals in captivity. Like many other debates there are supporters and opponents that might argue different aspects of whether we should keep animals in zoos or not. During research, I found interesting information about animal’s behavior in captivity. According to Mason, captive animals, especially those who are not domesticated propose repetitive actions called stereotypical behaviors. These types of behaviors that have no obvious goal such as swaying, repetitive pacing, head bobbing or bar-biting are mainly due to the frustration and stresses that animals are undergoing.
Although those who seek to end animal research – either because they choose to reject its well established usefulness or because they believe the life of a rat is equal in importance to that of a child – persist in their efforts to sabotage medical research with break-ins, thefts, arsons, harassment and intimidation of researchers, there can be no question that there is a great need for animals in medical research to prevent deadly diseases, to ensure the safety of the general public of unstable cosmetics and household products that are used every