Afterwards, in groups, the participant’s answers began to merge to a group norm. When tested individually again, participants gave answers similar to the group norm, demonstrating a lasting effect. Although Sherif’s studies showed that individuals may conform with other group members, it is argued that the task was highly ambiguous, with no definitive or obvious answer. Asch (1951) (cited in Hayes, 1994, pp 571-572), however, showed that people may conform when there is no ambiguity at all. Asch’s line comparison study asked a participant, in a group of confederates, to identify which line from a set of three was the same as the stimulus, although the answer was obvious.
They were not inventing anything new but reclaiming something ancient. This is why governments tend to fall apart, because people often want to come together freely and be themselves, rather then fit a mold that is presented for them. Hobbes foretold that it was a human condition that war fought by each against each, making it hard for anything good to come out of it, or learn
A result of breaking down each theory, one can easily observe the strengths and assets and flaws of each theory. One can see what assumptions are based on, and the boundaries of each. For example, Freud believed personality development occurs because of biological influences. On the other hand, Horney believed that cultural and social influences impart to the same effects on personality development. Freud’s theory was biased toward women because of the period in which it was developed.
They also struggled with understanding the difference between their ‘best alternative’ and the lens assigned ‘best alternative’. Ethical lenses adopted by individuals tend to influence decision making by affecting how problems and conflicts are approached. Your ethical lens of preference makes you ‘blind’ to the other approaches and makes it difficult to see the benefits of the other lenses and weaknesses of your own lens. This adds tension to groups because what seems like the best solution to a problem to a single team member might be completely inappropriate to another. The team found that these different approaches can create more issues within a team or group if you don’t understand that everyone has their own ‘right approach.’ To a rights and responsibilities lens approaching an issue head on and dealing with the conflict directly might not be fun, but it is necessary in order to move past the problem in the most efficient way possible.
Lakoff emphasizes that “[t]his uncertainty is reinforced in more subliminal ways, too. There is a peculiar sentence-intonation pattern, used almost exclusively by women, as far as I know, which changes a declarative answer into a question. The effect of using the rising inflection typical of a yes-no question is to imply that the speaker is seeking confirmation.…”(510). By frequently ending statements in questions the speaker loses credibility and in a way asks her audience for confirmation. Not only do women undermine their image by using this - women’s language- but, a woman’s image can be altered by the words that are used to describe her.
• How do these factors play a role in our expectations of other people? Evaluating someone through their social class, looks, race, religion, and more can drastically affect our expectations. When you develop expectations on a person you set yourself up for failure and allow yourself to be let down. If someone is gorgeous on TV or in images you evaluate that they truly are a beautiful person. When you meet them and you see they look like everyone else and are not that person you expected them to be you are taken back and let down.
Although at times these labels may be accurate, many of us determine early in an interaction or presentation that we don’t understand the subject, don’t like the person, or find lit-tle of interest or importance in the message. We then tune out the speaker and spend our time thinking about other matters. By not listening to the message, we have no way to assess accurately the value of what we might have heard. Barrier Two: Emotionally Resisting Messages. Often we react quickly to emotionally charged words or subjects.
Another thing that this test told me was that I am judging. Apart of my life is to judge people off of their outer appearance to learn exactly how this person wants me to talk them. Also with certain personality traits I judge people just to see if they will be a solid person to be associating myself with. This judging is the way that I was raised. I also believe that my perception can be a little skewed sometimes, because I look at the best in people and have been walked all over for doing that.
If someone is acting suspicious or look nasty or thuggish, yes they are going to gain people’s attention. . “I can avoid spending time with people whom I was trained to mistrust and who have learned to mistrust my kind or me.” I do not agree with the author of this essay. Yes, some things do seem to favor one race or gender than others but the majority of the situations were just overkill. Yes, the white race it’s the majority.
My reasoning is because most don’t understand me, and they take my demeanor as cockiness. Cockiness can turn people off instantly. There is a saying that first impression is a lasting impression. Communication is vital and needed to get things accomplished. Lack of communications means lack of progression.